Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of land configuration and nutrient management on growth analysis and yield of kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Chanchala Rani Patel

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field investigation was under taken during kharif seasons of 2019 and 2020 at the Research Farm of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, College of Agriculture and Research Station, Raigarh (CG). The results of the experiment revealed that ridge and furrow land configuration method recorded the maximum values of growth analysis parameters (leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate) and pod as well as haulm yields of groundnut and these parameters were the minimum under flatbed land configuration method. Further, the relative growth rate analysis factor was increased substantially between sowing to 50 DAS. Thereafter, continuous decrease trend was noticed till 100 DAS under different land configurations treatments, Similarly, among the nutrient management practices, 100% RDN (30, 60 and 30 kg of N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) +5t FYM ha-1 recorded the maximum values of above all growth analysis characters as well as pod and haulm yields of kharif groundnut. The lowest values of these characters were recorded with absolute control practice of nutrient management system. Further, the relative crop growth rate obtained values were more or less equal under nutrient management treatments in relation to different time intervals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow had maximum leaf area index, leaf area duration and crop growth rate; flatbed had minimum values.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
ridge and furrow land configuration methode0
Outcome
leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth ratee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
flatbed land configuration methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge and furrow land configuration method recorded the maximum values of growth analysis parameters (leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate) and pod as well as haulm yields of groundnut and these parameters were the minimum under flatbed land configuration method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow had maximum net assimilation rate versus flatbed.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
ridge and furrow land configuration methode0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
flatbed land configuration methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge and furrow land configuration method recorded the maximum values of growth analysis parameters (leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate) and pod as well as haulm yields of groundnut and these parameters were the minimum under flatbed land configuration method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow had maximum pod and haulm yields versus flatbed.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
ridge and furrow land configuration methode0
Outcome
pod as well as haulm yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
flatbed land configuration methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge and furrow land configuration method recorded the maximum values of growth analysis parameters (leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate and net assimilation rate) and pod as well as haulm yields of groundnut and these parameters were the minimum under flatbed land configuration method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate increased from sowing to 50 days after sowing.

Outcome
relative growth rate analysis factore0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
between sowing to 50 DASe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the relative growth rate analysis factor was increased substantially between sowing to 50 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate decreased continuously through 100 days after sowing.

Outcome
continuous decrease trende0
Qualifier
till 100 DASe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Thereafter, continuous decrease trend was noticed till 100 DAS under different land configurations treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDN plus FYM treatment gave maximum growth analysis characters.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
100% RDN (30, 60 and 30 kg of N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) +5t FYM ha-1e0
Outcome
growth analysis characterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDN (30, 60 and 30 kg of N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) +5t FYM ha-1 recorded the maximum values of above all growth analysis characters as well as pod and haulm yields of kharif groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDN plus FYM treatment gave maximum pod and haulm yields.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
100% RDN (30, 60 and 30 kg of N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) +5t FYM ha-1e0
Outcome
pod and haulm yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDN (30, 60 and 30 kg of N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) +5t FYM ha-1 recorded the maximum values of above all growth analysis characters as well as pod and haulm yields of kharif groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute nutrient control produced the lowest growth and yield values.

Treatment
absolute control practice of nutrient management systeme0
Outcome
these characterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values of these characters were recorded with absolute control practice of nutrient management system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative crop growth rate values were approximately equal across nutrient treatments at different intervals.

Treatment
nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
relative crop growth ratee0
Direction
more or less equale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the relative crop growth rate obtained values were more or less equal under nutrient management treatments in relation to different time intervals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1272 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

94 papers: 79 positive, 15 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

178 papers: 160 positive, 18 negative or no effect

159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

potassium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.