Abstract
The investigation was carried out at the Horticulture farm of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from April to October, 2019. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with two factors and five replications. Factor A was different aged suckers namely A1= 1st year sucker, A2= 2nd year sucker and A3= 3rd year sucker. Factor B was different types of bagging like B1= Black, B2= White, B3= Blue and B4= Control. Five fingers were randomly selected from each hand and were analyzed for different parameters. The result of the experiment showed that all the parameters were studied found significantly different among the treatments. Among the effect of sucker age, the highest plant height (301cm), plant diameter (74.4 cm), number of fingers per bunch (55.1), bunch weight per plant (13.15 kg), weight all hands per bunch (11.79 kg), weight of single finger at ripening time (145.4 g) were found from A3 (3rd year sucker ). Also, the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g), weight of single peel at ripening time (38.0 g), TSS (20.05 %), moisture content of pulp (78.4 %), dry weight of peel (5.36 g) and moisture content of peel (85.76%) was found from A3 (3rd year sucker). On the other hand, among the effect of bagging, the highest growth and yield like fingers per bunch (57.47), bunch weight per plant (12.83 kg), weight all hands per bunch (11.42 kg) were found in B2 (white polythene). Also, the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g), weight of single finger at ripening time (137.3 g), weight of pulp at ripening time (102.3 g), moisture content of pulp (78.77%), moisture content of peel (85.41%) were found from B2 (white polythene). The combined effect of sucker age and bagging materials, the highest growth and yield like length of bunch (76.2cm), bunch weight per plant (14.58kg), weight all hands per bunch (13.04 kg) was found in A3B2 (3rd year sucker with white polythene). In a nutshell, the present study showed that different aged suckers and bunch covering had a better effect on physio-morphological characteristics, yield and quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest plant height (301cm) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 301cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Among the effect of sucker age, the highest plant height (301cm)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest plant diameter (74.4 cm) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- plant diametere0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 74.4 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“plant diameter (74.4 cm)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest number of fingers per bunch (55.1) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- number of fingers per bunche0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 55.1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“number of fingers per bunch (55.1)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest bunch weight per plant (13.15 kg) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- bunch weight per plante0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 13.15 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“bunch weight per plant (13.15 kg)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest weight all hands per bunch (11.79 kg) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- weight all hands per bunche0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 11.79 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight all hands per bunch (11.79 kg)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest weight of single finger at ripening time (145.4 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- weight of single finger at ripening timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 145.4 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight of single finger at ripening time (145.4 g)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest plant height (301cm)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- weight of single pulp at ripening timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 107.3 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest weight of single peel at ripening time (38.0 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- weight of single peel at ripening timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 38.0 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight of single peel at ripening time (38.0 g)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest TSS (20.05 %) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 20.05 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“TSS (20.05 %)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest moisture content of pulp (78.4 %) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- moisture content of pulpe0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 78.4 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“moisture content of pulp (78.4 %)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest dry weight of peel (5.36 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- dry weight of peele0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 5.36 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“dry weight of peel (5.36 g)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
3rd year sucker had the highest moisture content of peel (85.76%) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- 3rd year suckere1
- Outcome
- moisture content of peele0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 85.76%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“moisture content of peel (85.76%)”
e1“A3 (3rd year sucker )”
e2“the highest weight of single pulp at ripening time (107.3 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest fingers per bunch (57.47) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- fingers per bunche0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 57.47e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“fingers per bunch (57.47)”
e1“were found in B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest growth and yield like fingers per bunch (57.47)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest bunch weight per plant (12.83 kg) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- bunch weight per plante0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 12.83 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“bunch weight per plant (12.83 kg)”
e1“were found in B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest growth and yield like fingers per bunch (57.47)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest weight all hands per bunch (11.42 kg) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- weight all hands per bunche0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 11.42 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight all hands per bunch (11.42 kg)”
e1“were found in B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest growth and yield like fingers per bunch (57.47)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- weight of single finger at harvesting timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 157 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
e1“were found from B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest weight of single finger at ripening time (137.3 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- weight of single finger at ripening timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 137.3 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight of single finger at ripening time (137.3 g)”
e1“were found from B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest weight of pulp at ripening time (102.3 g) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- weight of pulp at ripening timee0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 102.3 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“weight of pulp at ripening time (102.3 g)”
e1“were found from B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest moisture content of pulp (78.77%) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- moisture content of pulpe0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 78.77%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“moisture content of pulp (78.77%)”
e1“were found from B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
Claim · model-written summary
white polythene had the highest moisture content of peel (85.41%) among the studied treatments.
- Taxon
- BANANAt0
- Material
- AMRITSAGARt0
- Treatment
- white polythenee1
- Outcome
- moisture content of peele0
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 85.41%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“moisture content of peel (85.41%)”
e1“were found from B2 (white polythene)”
e2“the highest weight of single finger at harvesting time (157 g)”
t0“BANANA CV. AMRITSAGAR”
The same questions in other papers
poly(ethylene) · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →poly(ethylene) · quality: grain · MusaResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
poly(ethylene) · yield · MusaResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.