Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Yield and economics of banana Cv. grand nain influenced by foliar spray of water soluble fertilizes on banana bunch

Patil Sj; Patel Nb; Patel Ka

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment entitled “Effect of post shooting foliar spray of fertilizers on yield and economics of banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Grand Nain” was conducted during the year 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 at Regional Horticultural Research Station, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat). The experiment was laid out with eleven treatments in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) and replicated three times. The treatments included SOP (1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0%), Urea (1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0%), KNO3 (0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5%) and Pouch feeding (300g fresh cow dung + 20g Ammonium Sulphate + 10g SOP) along with control. The first spray was done immediately after complete emergence of bunch and second spray was done 15 days after the first spray. All bunches were covered with 18µ blue polythene. Quantity parameters were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results of present investigation revealed that the minimum days taken from flowering to harvesting and maximum length of bunch, girth of bunch, weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of finger, weight of bunch and yield per hectare were recorded significantly in SOP 1.5%. Economics indicated that banana bunch sprayed twice with SOP 1.5% and sleeve with 18µ blue polythene found most remunerative as it gave the highest gross income and net realization with maximum benefit cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOP 1.5% gave the minimum time from flowering to harvest.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
SOP 1.5%e0
Outcome
days taken from flowering to harvestinge0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum days taken from flowering to harvesting and maximum length of bunch, girth of bunch, weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of finger, weight of bunch and yield per hectare were recorded significantly in SOP 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Grand Nain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOP 1.5% maximized bunch length and girth.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
SOP 1.5%e0
Outcome
length of bunch, girth of bunche0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of bunch, girth of bunch, weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of finger, weight of bunch and yield per hectare were recorded significantly in SOP 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Grand Nain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOP 1.5% maximized third hand weight and finger length and girth.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
SOP 1.5%e0
Outcome
weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of fingere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of bunch, girth of bunch, weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of finger, weight of bunch and yield per hectare were recorded significantly in SOP 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Grand Nain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOP 1.5% maximized bunch weight and yield per hectare.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
SOP 1.5%e0
Outcome
weight of bunch and yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of bunch, girth of bunch, weight of third hand, length of finger, girth of finger, weight of bunch and yield per hectare were recorded significantly in SOP 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) cv. Grand Nain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice sprayed SOP 1.5% with blue polythene gave the highest gross income and net realization.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
sprayed twice with SOP 1.5% and sleeve with 18µ blue polythenee0
Outcome
gross income and net realizatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“banana bunch sprayed twice with SOP 1.5% and sleeve with 18µ blue polythene found most remunerative as it gave the highest gross income and net realization with maximum benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice sprayed SOP 1.5% with blue polythene gave the maximum benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
sprayed twice with SOP 1.5% and sleeve with 18µ blue polythenee0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“banana bunch sprayed twice with SOP 1.5% and sleeve with 18µ blue polythene found most remunerative as it gave the highest gross income and net realization with maximum benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1401 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · yield · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · yield · MusaResults agree

55 papers: 55 positive, 0 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.