Paper · 2024 · The future of Horticulture

Evaluating the Efficacy of Some Biological Control Applications in Controlling Powdery Mildew Disease of Cucumber Plants in Greenhouses

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effectiveness of the tested biological control treatments, i.e., Trichoderma album, T. harzianum, T. hamatum and T. viride; biopesticides, such as Blight Stop (T. harzianum), which is used at the rate of 1 L/100 liters of water; and additionally natural compounds, such as micronized sulfur fungicide, which is utilized at a rate of 250 gm/100 liters of water in decreasing germination and severity of Podosphaera fuliginea powdery mildew disease on cucumber cv. Hybrid 20 to the control under in vitro and greenhouses. The treatment with Micronic sulfur fungicide reduced inhibitory germination percentages and disease severity the most (92.69 and 87.30%), followed by the T. harzianum isolate (86.96 and 81.71%) as compared to the control treatment. The application of cucumber plants with T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100 exhibited the greatest decrease in the inhibition of disease severity and the greatest increase in yield, biochemical analysis, including total chlorophyll, total phenolic content, peroxidase (PO), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme activities throughout the growing season 2024 under greenhouse condition, compared to untreated plants. On the other hand, T. hamatum demonstrated the least response from treatments. There was no observable, major variations between the other treatments and the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronic sulfur gave the largest reduction in pathogen germination, 92.69%.

Treatment
Micronic sulfur fungicidee0
Outcome
germination percentagese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
92.69e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with Micronic sulfur fungicide reduced inhibitory germination percentages and disease severity the most (92.69 and 87.30%), followed by the T. harzianum isolate (86.96 and 81.71%) as compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronic sulfur gave the largest reduction in disease severity, 87.30%.

Treatment
Micronic sulfur fungicidee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
87.30%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with Micronic sulfur fungicide reduced inhibitory germination percentages and disease severity the most (92.69 and 87.30%), followed by the T. harzianum isolate (86.96 and 81.71%) as compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum reduced pathogen germination by 86.96%.

Treatment
T. harzianum isolatee0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germination percentagese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
86.96e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with Micronic sulfur fungicide reduced inhibitory germination percentages and disease severity the most (92.69 and 87.30%), followed by the T. harzianum isolate (86.96 and 81.71%) as compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum reduced disease severity by 81.71%.

Treatment
T. harzianum isolatee0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
81.71%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with Micronic sulfur fungicide reduced inhibitory germination percentages and disease severity the most (92.69 and 87.30%), followed by the T. harzianum isolate (86.96 and 81.71%) as compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum at 1:100 gave the greatest decrease in disease severity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100e0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
untreated plantse0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of cucumber plants with T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100 exhibited the greatest decrease in the inhibition of disease severity and the greatest increase in yield, biochemical analysis, including total chlorophyll, total phenolic content, peroxidase (PO), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme activities throughout the growing season 2024 under greenhouse condition, compared to untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum at 1:100 gave the greatest yield increase.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100e0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated plantse0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of cucumber plants with T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100 exhibited the greatest decrease in the inhibition of disease severity and the greatest increase in yield, biochemical analysis, including total chlorophyll, total phenolic content, peroxidase (PO), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme activities throughout the growing season 2024 under greenhouse condition, compared to untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum at 1:100 gave the greatest increase in total chlorophyll, total phenolic content and enzyme activities.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100e0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total chlorophyll, total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated plantse0
Setting
greenhouse conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of cucumber plants with T. harzianum at a rate of 1:100 exhibited the greatest decrease in the inhibition of disease severity and the greatest increase in yield, biochemical analysis, including total chlorophyll, total phenolic content, peroxidase (PO), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme activities throughout the growing season 2024 under greenhouse condition, compared to untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1214 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. hamatum had the weakest response among treatments.

Interactor
T. hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
least responsee0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. hamatum demonstrated the least response from treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatments showed no major variation from the control.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Outcome
variationse0
Direction
no observable, major variationse0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was no observable, major variations between the other treatments and the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1381 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fungicide · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.