Paper · 2024 · Egyptian Journal of Desert Research

THE ROLE OF SOME DIFFERENT SILICON FORMULATIONS AND WINDBREAKS TO CONTROL MANGO SHIELD SCALE INSECT (MILVISCUTULUS MANGIFERAE (GREEN) (HEMIPETRA: COCCIDAE) ON MANGO TREES AFFECTED BY AEOLIAN DEPOSITS

Essam A. Ali; Sahar Ali Attia; Hosam Eldein M. Elgamal

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The current study was carried out during the two successive seasons of 2021 and 2022 on Ewais mango cultivar affected by the movement of sand dunes and grown in a private orchard in El-Mostakbal City, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, to evaluate the effect of silicon formulations spraying and casuarina windbreak to control mango shield scale insect Milviscutulus mangiferae (green) (Hemipetra: Coccidae), and its effect on vegetative growth, leaf characteristics and yield. It can be concluded that the successful control of the mango shield scale insect can be achieved by diatom and Aglev Si 300 with a reduction percentage of more than 80%, followed by kaolin (60-87%) and bentonite (50-70%), respectively in different stages of mango shield scale insect (immature, adult and ovipositing adult stages). The efficacy of kaolineted potassium silicate and Si El-Ghanem compounds on the infestation percentage decreased with different stages with a reduction percentage of 79-91%, respectively against different stages of M. mangiferae. Extra power, triple power, boiled lime and sulfur against different stages had more than 90% reduction, compared to the control treatment. The results revealed that spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreak led to an increase in shoot diameter and length, leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf water content, and yield. While, it decreased hard leaf character and leaf succulence grade, which led to an increase in the effectiveness of spraying silicon formulations in reducing infection. In addition, the casuarina windbreak significantly reduced sand drift.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diatom and Aglev Si 300 reduced mango shield scale by more than 80%.

Treatment
diatom and Aglev Si 300e0
Interactor
mango shield scale insecte0pest
Outcome
mango shield scale insecte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
more than 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“successful control of the mango shield scale insect can be achieved by diatom and Aglev Si 300 with a reduction percentage of more than 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin reduced mango shield scale across stages by 60-87%.

Treatment
kaoline0
Interactor
mango shield scale insecte0pest
Outcome
mango shield scale insecte0
Value
60-87%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by kaolin (60-87%) and bentonite (50-70%), respectively in different stages of mango shield scale insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentonite reduced mango shield scale across stages by 50-70%.

Treatment
bentonitee0
Interactor
mango shield scale insecte0pest
Outcome
mango shield scale insecte0
Value
50-70%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by kaolin (60-87%) and bentonite (50-70%), respectively in different stages of mango shield scale insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolineted potassium silicate and Si El-Ghanem reduced infestation of M. mangiferae by 79-91%.

Treatment
kaolineted potassium silicate and Si El-Ghanem compoundse0
Interactor
M. mangiferaeMilviscutulus mangiferaee0pathogen
Outcome
infestation percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
79-91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Milviscutulus mangiferae
Milviscutulus mangiferae · InteractorEven Dankowicz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of kaolineted potassium silicate and Si El-Ghanem compounds on the infestation percentage decreased with different stages with a reduction percentage of 79-91%, respectively against different stages of M. mangiferae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra power, triple power, boiled lime and sulfur reduced scale stages by more than 90% relative to control.

Treatment
Extra power, triple power, boiled lime and sulfure0
Outcome
different stagese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
more than 90%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extra power, triple power, boiled lime and sulfur against different stages had more than 90% reduction, compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon sprays with casuarina windbreak increased shoot diameter, shoot length and leaf area.

Treatment
spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreake0
Outcome
shoot diameter and length, leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreak led to an increase in shoot diameter and length, leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf water content, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon sprays with casuarina windbreak increased leaf chlorophyll and water content.

Treatment
spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreake0
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf water contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreak led to an increase in shoot diameter and length, leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf water content, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon sprays with casuarina windbreak increased mango yield.

Treatment
spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreake0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying silicon formulations with casuarina windbreak led to an increase in shoot diameter and length, leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll content, leaf water content, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon sprays with windbreak decreased leaf hardness and succulence.

Outcome
hard leaf character and leaf succulence gradee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased hard leaf character and leaf succulence grade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Casuarina windbreak significantly reduced sand drift.

Treatment
casuarina windbreake0
Outcome
sand drifte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the casuarina windbreak significantly reduced sand drift”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–170 · show in text ↑

kaolin · organism · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

bentonite · organism · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

application · physiology: water · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.