Paper · 2025 · Plants

Chemical Composition of Essential Oil from Apium graveolens L. and Its Biological Activities Against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae)

Ruchuon Wanna; Darika Bunphan; Benjapon Kunlanit; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of essential oils from certain herbal plants offers a promising alternative to synthetic insecticides for controlling the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae), a major pest that causes significant damage to stored grains. Essential oils, particularly from aromatic herbs in the Apiaceae family, are widely used in medicinal, cosmetic, and food industries and provided insecticidal properties to mitigate the environmental and health hazards associated with synthetic insecticides. This research aimed to investigate the insecticidal and repellent effects of Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oil against S. zeamais. Chemical analysis of the commercially produced essential oil from A. graveolens seeds was conducted using a gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer (GC-MS), and the biological activity of the essential oil was determined by ingestion, contact, fumigation, and repellent tests. The analysis identified D-limonene (64.21%) and α-humulene (17.46%) as primary components of the oil. Toxicity assays revealed an observable contact toxicity, with higher concentrations and prolonged exposure increasing its effectiveness. The contact toxicity assays reported an LC50 of 19.83 nL/adult after 72 h. Additionally, the essential oil displayed repellent effects, effectively deterring weevils at concentrations above 16 µL/L air, but its feeding deterrence was weak. The essential oil’s strong insecticidal and repellent properties, which were concentration- and time-dependent, highlighted its potential as a sustainable alternative to synthetic pesticides for integrated pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D-limonene constituted 64.21% of celery seed oil.

Taxon
Apium graveolens L.Apium graveolenst0
Outcome
D-limonenee0
Value
64.21%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens
Apium graveolens · TaxonMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis identified D-limonene (64.21%) and α-humulene (17.46%) as primary components of the oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apium graveolens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

α-humulene constituted 17.46% of celery seed oil.

Taxon
Apium graveolens L.Apium graveolenst0
Outcome
α-humulenee0
Value
17.46%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens
Apium graveolens · TaxonMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis identified D-limonene (64.21%) and α-humulene (17.46%) as primary components of the oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apium graveolens L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Celery essential oil exhibited contact toxicity against S. zeamais.

Taxon
S. zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise1
Treatment
Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oile1
Outcome
contact toxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · TaxonThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity assays revealed an observable contact toxicity, with higher concentrations and prolonged exposure increasing its effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“the insecticidal and repellent effects of Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oil against S. zeamais.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–670 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher oil concentrations increased contact toxicity effectiveness.

Taxon
S. zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise1
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · TaxonThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity assays revealed an observable contact toxicity, with higher concentrations and prolonged exposure increasing its effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“the insecticidal and repellent effects of Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oil against S. zeamais.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–670 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer exposure increased contact toxicity effectiveness.

Taxon
S. zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise1
Treatment
prolonged exposuree0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · TaxonThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity assays revealed an observable contact toxicity, with higher concentrations and prolonged exposure increasing its effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“the insecticidal and repellent effects of Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oil against S. zeamais.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contact toxicity LC50 was 19.83 nL/adult after 72 hours.

Taxon
S. zeamaisSitophilus zeamaise1
Treatment
Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oile1
Outcome
LC50e0
Value
19.83 nL/adulte0
Qualifier
after 72 he0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · TaxonThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contact toxicity assays reported an LC50 of 19.83 nL/adult after 72 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“the insecticidal and repellent effects of Apium graveolens L. (celery) seed essential oil against S. zeamais.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil repelled weevils at concentrations above 16 µL/L air.

Taxon
weevilsCurculionidaee0
Treatment
essential oile0
Outcome
repellent effectse0
Direction
deterringe0
Qualifier
concentrations above 16 µL/L aire0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, the essential oil displayed repellent effects, effectively deterring weevils at concentrations above 16 µL/L air, but its feeding deterrence was weak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil feeding deterrence was weak.

Taxon
weevilsCurculionidaee0
Outcome
feeding deterrencee0
Qualifier
weake0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, the essential oil displayed repellent effects, effectively deterring weevils at concentrations above 16 µL/L air, but its feeding deterrence was weak.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1422 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors highlight oil as a potential sustainable alternative pesticide for integrated pest management.

Taxon
Sitophilus zeamais MotschulskySitophilus zeamaist0
Outcome
sustainable alternative to synthetic pesticides for integrated pest managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · TaxonThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The essential oil’s strong insecticidal and repellent properties, which were concentration- and time-dependent, highlighted its potential as a sustainable alternative to synthetic pesticides for integrated pest management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–131 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Sitophilus zeamais (maize weevil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.