Paper · 2025 · Applied Food Research

The effect of combined thermal and sonication treatment on shelf life extension and quality retention of banana

Mahfujul Alam; Mir Meahadi Hasan; Mohammad Mainuddin Molla; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

• Banana fruit physiological and antioxidant capability and postharvest treatment effectiveness were assessed. • The combined treatment increased antioxidant capacity and sensory quality. • The combined treatment reduced physiological properties, although storage had the least number of microorganisms. • Multivariate statistical analysis enabled a comprehensive investigation of quality parameters. The banana is categorized as a climacteric fruit, exhibiting a high susceptibility to decay and a limited duration for consumption after being harvested. The aim of this present study was to assess the impact thermal and sonication treatments on the physiological quality parameters and microbial load of banana fruits. On the 12th day of storage, the untreated bananas exhibited the highest weight loss percentage (21.44 ± 1.55 %) and decay incidence (100 ± 0 %). In contrast, the bananas treated with a combination of hot water (HW) and ultrasound (US) demonstrated significantly lower levels of weight loss 18.62 ± 1.14 % and decay incidence 65.63 ± 3.9 %, respectively. However, the antioxidant activity of combined treated (HW+US) banana fruits was considerably higher after treatments (p ≤ 0.05). The same treatment delayed the changes ash content, ascorbic acid, firmness, color content and demonstrated the greatest suppression of microbial growth, with values ranging from 1.09 ± 0.09 to 5.15 ± 0.24 log 10 cfu/g for total plate count (TPC) and 0.9 ± 0.11 to 5.01 ± 0.16 log 10 cfu/g for total yeast mold count (TYMC), during the 0th to 12th days of storage that contributed to the banana's prolonged shelf life. Based on the findings, combined hot water and ultrasound treatment (HW+US) can be considered promising postharvest treatment of bananas, could extend their shelf life, minimize microbial contamination, and enhance overall quality retention during ambient storage. Further refining of the imitations is recommended to optimize treatment conditions, which might evaluate the efficiency of HW+US on other perishable fruits and assess its scalability for commercial applications, hence contributing to waste reduction and enhanced marketability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined hot water and ultrasound reduced banana weight loss on day 12 to 18.62 ± 1.14%, versus 21.44 ± 1.55% untreated.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
combination of hot water (HW) and ultrasound (US)e0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
18.62 ± 1.14 %e0
Qualifier
21.44 ± 1.55 %e0
Comparator
untreated bananase0

Verbatim

e0

“On the 12th day of storage, the untreated bananas exhibited the highest weight loss percentage (21.44 ± 1.55 %) and decay incidence (100 ± 0 %). In contrast, the bananas treated with a combination of hot water (HW) and ultrasound (US) demonstrated significantly lower levels of weight loss 18.62 ± 1.14 % and decay incidence 65.63 ± 3.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced banana decay incidence on day 12 to 65.63 ± 3.9%, versus 100 ± 0% untreated.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
combination of hot water (HW) and ultrasound (US)e0
Outcome
decay incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
65.63 ± 3.9 %e0
Qualifier
100 ± 0 %e0
Comparator
untreated bananase0

Verbatim

e0

“On the 12th day of storage, the untreated bananas exhibited the highest weight loss percentage (21.44 ± 1.55 %) and decay incidence (100 ± 0 %). In contrast, the bananas treated with a combination of hot water (HW) and ultrasound (US) demonstrated significantly lower levels of weight loss 18.62 ± 1.14 % and decay incidence 65.63 ± 3.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment raised banana antioxidant activity.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
HW+USe0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
p ≤ 0.05e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the antioxidant activity of combined treated (HW+US) banana fruits was considerably higher after treatments (p ≤ 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment delayed changes in banana ash content, ascorbic acid and firmness.

Treatment
The same treatmente0
Outcome
ash content, ascorbic acid, firmnesse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment delayed the changes ash content, ascorbic acid, firmness, color content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment delayed changes in banana color.

Treatment
The same treatmente0
Outcome
color contente0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The same treatment delayed the changes ash content, ascorbic acid, firmness, color content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment most strongly suppressed microbial growth during storage.

Outcome
total plate count (TPC)e0
Direction
greatest suppressione0
Value
1.09 ± 0.09 to 5.15 ± 0.24 log 10 cfu/ge0
Qualifier
during the 0th to 12th days of storagee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“demonstrated the greatest suppression of microbial growth, with values ranging from 1.09 ± 0.09 to 5.15 ± 0.24 log 10 cfu/g for total plate count (TPC) and 0.9 ± 0.11 to 5.01 ± 0.16 log 10 cfu/g for total yeast mold count (TYMC), during the 0th to 12th days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment yielded total yeast mold counts ranging from 0.9 ± 0.11 to 5.01 ± 0.16 log10 cfu/g.

Outcome
total yeast mold count (TYMC)e0
Value
0.9 ± 0.11 to 5.01 ± 0.16 log 10 cfu/ge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“0.9 ± 0.11 to 5.01 ± 0.16 log 10 cfu/g for total yeast mold count (TYMC), during the 0th to 12th days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1567 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors consider combined hot water and ultrasound promising for banana shelf life and quality retention.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
combined hot water and ultrasound treatment (HW+US)e0
Outcome
extend their shelf life, minimize microbial contamination, and enhance overall quality retentione0
Qualifier
during ambient storagee0

Verbatim

e0

“combined hot water and ultrasound treatment (HW+US) can be considered promising postharvest treatment of bananas, could extend their shelf life, minimize microbial contamination, and enhance overall quality retention during ambient storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1886 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

physical treatment · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

physical treatment · quality: phytochemicals · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · quality: phytochemicals · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.