Paper · 2025 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Economic value of dual‐purpose cowpea as affected by variety, fertilizer, and environment

Augustine K. Obour; Aliou Faye; Tobi Moriaque Akplo; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Across the semiarid regions of West Africa, cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) varieties grown by farmers are either grain‐ or forage‐only, and often fields are not fertilized. Information regarding profitability of dual‐purpose over traditional varieties and fertilizer application in cowpea production system is limited. The main objective of this study was to quantify the economic value of newly released dual‐purpose and forage cowpea varieties and fertilizer inputs across the Senegalese peanut basin. This field study was conducted across three locations in Senegal (Bambey, Boulel, and Darou Mousty) in 2021 and 2022. Treatments were 20 cowpea varieties in the main plot and two levels of fertilizer (an unfertilized control and fertilized) in the subplot. Cowpea varieties E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR5, E‐BC4STR11, Kelle, and Melakh had relatively greater grain yields (average 429–474 kg ha −1 ) in all environments. Forage varieties 66‐35F and 58‐74F produced the most forage (average 2353 and 1717 kg ha −1 ) yields across environments. Fertilizer‐NPK application increased grain yield by 22%–40% in most environments. Unlike grain yield, varietal effects on forage yields occurred only with fertilizer application. Dual‐purpose cowpea varieties E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR2, E‐BC4STR5, and E‐BC4STR11 had a stable, significant economic value in our study compared with grain‐only variety Yacine (traditional variety) or forage variety 66‐35F. Fertilizer‐NPK increased net revenue in four out of six environments. We conclude that using dual‐purpose cowpea varieties provided significant economic advantage over traditional varieties, and application of fertilizer further increased the economic value. However, further studies are needed to determine the economically optimal fertilizer rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named cowpea varieties had relatively greater grain yield averaging 429–474 kg ha −1.

Material
E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR5, E‐BC4STR11, Kelle, and Melakhe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
429–474 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea varieties E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR5, E‐BC4STR11, Kelle, and Melakh had relatively greater grain yields (average 429–474 kg ha −1 ) in all environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage variety 66‐35F averaged 2353 kg ha −1 forage yield.

Material
66‐35Fe0
Outcome
foragee0
Direction
moste0
Value
2353e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage varieties 66‐35F and 58‐74F produced the most forage (average 2353 and 1717 kg ha −1 ) yields across environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage variety 58‐74F averaged 1717 kg ha −1 forage yield.

Material
58‐74Fe0
Outcome
foragee0
Direction
moste0
Value
1717 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage varieties 66‐35F and 58‐74F produced the most forage (average 2353 and 1717 kg ha −1 ) yields across environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer NPK increased grain yield by 22%–40% in most environments.

Treatment
Fertilizer‐NPK applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%–40%e0
Qualifier
most environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer‐NPK application increased grain yield by 22%–40% in most environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety affected forage yield only with fertilizer application.

Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
forage yieldse0
Qualifier
onlye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varietal effects on forage yields occurred only with fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four dual-purpose varieties had stable, significant economic value against traditional grain and forage comparators.

Material
E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR2, E‐BC4STR5, and E‐BC4STR11e0
Outcome
economic valuee0
Comparator
grain‐only variety Yacine (traditional variety) or forage variety 66‐35Fe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual‐purpose cowpea varieties E‐BC4STR1, E‐BC4STR2, E‐BC4STR5, and E‐BC4STR11 had a stable, significant economic value in our study compared with grain‐only variety Yacine (traditional variety) or forage variety 66‐35F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer NPK increased net revenue in four of six environments.

Treatment
Fertilizer‐NPKe0
Outcome
net revenuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
four out of six environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer‐NPK increased net revenue in four out of six environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.