Paper · 2024 · Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal

Effect of Irrigation System, Planting Density and Potassium Silicate Spraying on the Growth and Quality of Tomato

Athraa Hussein Hadi; Abdulraheem Assi Obaid

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to study the irrigation systems, planting density and potassium silicate spraying on the growth and quality of tomato. The experiments included three factors, the type of drip irrigation systems (S) as: single line irrigation (S1) and Double line irrigation (S2). The planting densities (D): D1 (40 cm) (density: 12 plants); D2 (50 cm) (density: 10 plants) and D3 (60 cm) (density: 8 plants). The third factor was potassium silicate spraying (K): as: K0 (control); K1 (treated of plant with 1 mL L-1) and K2 (treated with 2 mL L-1). Using a factorial experiment within a split-plot design, main plots were allocated to irrigation systems (S1 and S2). The results showed that, the single irrigation system (S1) produced a significant superiority in acidity 0.560 %; vitamin C 34.958 mg; TSS 3.846 and lycopene 2.264 mg, compared with double line (S2) which showed superiority in β-carotene pigment 2.448 mg. Planting density at a distance of 60 cm produced the highest values in TSS 3.73; fruit hardness 3.590 kg cm-2 , β-carotene 2.41mg, while planting at 40 cm showed superiority in lycopene pigment 2.034 mg. Treatment with potassium silicate at a concentration of 1 mL L-1 (K1) was found to produce the highest lycopene and β-carotene, while a concentration of 2 mL L-1 had superiority in acidity and vitamin C. From the results, using the single irrigation system had superiority in producing tomato with high qualities, while planting tomato at a distance of 40 cm had superiority in most qualities characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-line irrigation had superior acidity at 0.560%.

Treatment
single irrigation system (S1)e0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
0.560 %e0
Comparator
double line (S2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation system (S1) produced a significant superiority in acidity 0.560 %; vitamin C 34.958 mg; TSS 3.846 and lycopene 2.264 mg, compared with double line (S2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-line irrigation had superior vitamin C at 34.958 mg.

Treatment
single irrigation system (S1)e0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
34.958 mge0
Comparator
double line (S2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation system (S1) produced a significant superiority in acidity 0.560 %; vitamin C 34.958 mg; TSS 3.846 and lycopene 2.264 mg, compared with double line (S2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-line irrigation had superior TSS at 3.846.

Treatment
single irrigation system (S1)e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
3.846e0
Comparator
double line (S2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation system (S1) produced a significant superiority in acidity 0.560 %; vitamin C 34.958 mg; TSS 3.846 and lycopene 2.264 mg, compared with double line (S2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-line irrigation had superior lycopene at 2.264 mg.

Treatment
single irrigation system (S1)e0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
2.264 mge0
Comparator
double line (S2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation system (S1) produced a significant superiority in acidity 0.560 %; vitamin C 34.958 mg; TSS 3.846 and lycopene 2.264 mg, compared with double line (S2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-line irrigation had superior β-carotene at 2.448 mg.

Treatment
double line (S2)e0
Outcome
β-carotene pigmente0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
2.448 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double line (S2) which showed superiority in β-carotene pigment 2.448 mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60 cm gave the highest TSS at 3.73.

Treatment
Planting density at a distance of 60 cme0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.73e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density at a distance of 60 cm produced the highest values in TSS 3.73; fruit hardness 3.590 kg cm-2 , β-carotene 2.41mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60 cm gave the highest fruit hardness at 3.590 kg cm-2.

Treatment
Planting density at a distance of 60 cme0
Outcome
fruit hardnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.590 kg cm-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density at a distance of 60 cm produced the highest values in TSS 3.73; fruit hardness 3.590 kg cm-2 , β-carotene 2.41mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60 cm gave the highest β-carotene at 2.41mg.

Treatment
Planting density at a distance of 60 cme0
Outcome
β-carotenee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.41mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting density at a distance of 60 cm produced the highest values in TSS 3.73; fruit hardness 3.590 kg cm-2 , β-carotene 2.41mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 40 cm had superior lycopene at 2.034 mg.

Treatment
planting at 40 cme0
Outcome
lycopene pigmente0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
2.034 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting at 40 cm showed superiority in lycopene pigment 2.034 mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate at 1 mL L-1 gave the highest lycopene and β-carotene.

Treatment
potassium silicate at a concentration of 1 mL L-1 (K1)e0
Outcome
lycopene and β-carotenee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium silicate at a concentration of 1 mL L-1 (K1) was found to produce the highest lycopene and β-carotene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate at 2 mL L-1 improved acidity and vitamin C.

Treatment
a concentration of 2 mL L-1e0
Outcome
acidity and vitamin Ce0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a concentration of 2 mL L-1 had superiority in acidity and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Quality of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that single-line irrigation yields high-quality tomato.

Outcome
using the single irrigation systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the single irrigation system had superiority in producing tomato with high qualities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1454 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that 40 cm spacing was superior for most quality traits.

Outcome
planting tomato at a distance of 40 cme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting tomato at a distance of 40 cm had superiority in most qualities characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1550 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

density · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.