Abstract
Plant density and stem pruning are factors affecting production of field-grown indeterminate tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plants were established at plant densities of 16,000, 20,000, or 30,000 plants ha−1 and pruning treatments were no stem pruning (0S), prune side shoots below the first flower truss (1F), or prune plants to 1 stem (1S) or 2 stems (2S). Increased plant density resulted in fewer fruit, marketable yield, and total yield per plant. Plant density did not affect marketable and total yield per hectare. Plants subjected to no pruning, or pruning of side shoots below the first flower truss, had the highest marketable yield per plant and per hectare. The lowest plant density, and no pruning, tended toward increased total yield per hectare. A plant density of 16,000 plants ha−1, without stem pruning, is recommended based on cost saving of hybrid seed, due to use of fewer plants, and labor for pruning.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Higher density reduced fruit number, marketable yield and total yield per tomato plant.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Increased plant densitye0
- Outcome
- fruit, marketable yield, and total yield per plante0
- Direction
- fewere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increased plant density resulted in fewer fruit, marketable yield, and total yield per plant”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant density did not affect marketable and total tomato yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Plant densitye0
- Outcome
- marketable and total yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plant density did not affect marketable and total yield per hectare”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
No pruning gave the highest marketable tomato yield per plant and hectare.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- no pruninge0
- Outcome
- marketable yield per plant and per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plants subjected to no pruning, or pruning of side shoots below the first flower truss, had the highest marketable yield per plant and per hectare”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning side shoots below the first flower truss gave the highest marketable tomato yield per plant and hectare.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- pruning of side shoots below the first flower trusse0
- Outcome
- marketable yield per plant and per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Plants subjected to no pruning, or pruning of side shoots below the first flower truss, had the highest marketable yield per plant and per hectare”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest density tended toward increased total tomato yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- lowest plant densitye0
- Outcome
- total yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- tended towarde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest plant density, and no pruning, tended toward increased total yield per hectare”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
No pruning tended toward increased total tomato yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- no pruninge0
- Outcome
- total yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- tended towarde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest plant density, and no pruning, tended toward increased total yield per hectare”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
A density of 16,000 plants ha−1 without pruning is recommended to save seed and pruning labor.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Outcome
- A plant density of 16,000 plants ha−1, without stem pruning, is recommendede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A plant density of 16,000 plants ha−1, without stem pruning, is recommended based on cost saving of hybrid seed, due to use of fewer plants, and labor for pruning”
t0“Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →density · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →pruning · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →density · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.