Abstract
Field experiments were carried out to study the effect of herbicide and micronutrient spray on different verities of rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Students’ Instructional farm, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur (U.P.), during Kharif season 2022 and 2023. The experiment was laid out in split-split plot design with three replications and 24 treatment combinations comprising of two varieties viz. Arize 6444 Gold (V1) and PB 1509 (V2) were kept in main plots and three herbicidal treatments viz. Control (W1), Bispyribac-sodium10% SC@ 20 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAT (W2), Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 at 25 DAT (W3) were kept in Sub plots and four micronutrients application viz, Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT (M1), Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT (M2), Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT (M3), Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT (M4) were kept in Sub-sub plots. Result revealed that Arize 6444 Gold variety had better weed suppression compare to PB 1509. On other side, herbicidal application with Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 spray at 25 DAT, provided the most effective control against weed flora, weed fresh weight, dry weight and weed control efficiency, among all the growth stages. However, foliar spray of Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT had a notable impact on reducing dry weed weight and significant influenced on weed control efficiency.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Arize 6444 Gold suppressed weeds better than PB 1509.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Material
- Arize 6444 Golde0
- Outcome
- weed suppressione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- PB 1509e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arize 6444 Gold variety had better weed suppression compare to PB 1509”
e1“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Triafamone plus ethoxysulfuron gave the most effective weed flora control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 spray at 25 DATe0
- Outcome
- control against weed florae0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“herbicidal application with Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 spray at 25 DAT, provided the most effective control against weed flora, weed fresh weight, dry weight and weed control efficiency, among all the growth stages”
e1“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Triafamone plus ethoxysulfuron gave the most effective control of weed fresh weight, dry weight, and weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 spray at 25 DATe0
- Outcome
- weed fresh weight, dry weight and weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Qualifier
- among all the growth stagese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“herbicidal application with Triafamone 20% + Ethoxysulfuron 10 WG @ 225g ha-1 spray at 25 DAT, provided the most effective control against weed flora, weed fresh weight, dry weight and weed control efficiency, among all the growth stages”
e1“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The five-component micronutrient foliar spray reduced dry weed weight.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DATe0
- Outcome
- dry weed weighte0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray of Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT had a notable impact on reducing dry weed weight”
e1“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The five-component micronutrient foliar spray significantly influenced weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DATe0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zinc Sulphate 0.5% + Ferrous Sulphate 1% + Manganese Sulphate 0.1% + Borax 0.2% + Silicon 0.1% foliar spray at 45 and 60 DAT had a notable impact on reducing dry weed weight and significant influenced on weed control efficiency”
e1“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Ethoxysulfuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →zinc sulfate · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
triafamone · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.