Abstract
The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an innovative multi-nutrient fertiliser (PRO complete) applied foliarly with a standard fertiliser (TRA complete) in triticale crops. PRO complete contained macronutrients (N, P, K), micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Zn, with Fe and Zn complexed with amino acids), and trace elements (Cr, I, Li, Se—combined with plant extracts). TRA complete had the same quantitative composition, but the micronutrients and trace elements were in mineral form or in complex with EDTA. The experiment was conducted on triticale grown in a soil culture in a growing hall. The triticale yield and quality were determined. The fertilisers had no significant effect on straw yield and macronutrient (N, P, K, Mg, Ca) content in straw and grain. They caused a significant increase in grain yield, but PRO complete was more effective, also in terms of increasing the content of some micronutrients, particularly in straw. Both fertilisers increased the content of Cr, Li, and Se in straw. The application of the fertilisers contributed to some extent to triticale biofortification. In conclusion, the use of foliar multi-compound fertilisers is a beneficial choice for optimising crop yield and quality. However, their chemical composition and dosage should be further developed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizers had no significant effect on straw yield.
- Taxon
- Triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- The fertiliserse0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fertilisers had no significant effect on straw yield and macronutrient (N, P, K, Mg, Ca) content in straw and grain.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizers had no significant effect on macronutrient content in straw and grain.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- The fertiliserse0
- Outcome
- macronutrient (N, P, K, Mg, Ca) content in straw and graine0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fertilisers had no significant effect on straw yield and macronutrient (N, P, K, Mg, Ca) content in straw and grain.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizers significantly increased grain yield.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- The fertiliserse1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“They caused a significant increase in grain yield”
e1“The fertilisers”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
PRO complete increased grain yield more effectively than TRA complete.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- PRO completee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- TRA completet1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but PRO complete was more effective”
e1“increasing the content of some micronutrients, particularly in straw.”
e2“grain yield”
t0“Triticale”
t1“standard fertiliser (TRA complete)”
Claim · model-written summary
PRO complete was more effective at increasing some micronutrients, especially in straw.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- PRO completee0
- Outcome
- content of some micronutrients, particularly in strawe0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- TRA completee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRO complete was more effective, also in terms of increasing the content of some micronutrients, particularly in straw.”
e1“standard fertiliser (TRA complete)”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Both fertilizers increased Cr, Li and Se content in straw.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- Both fertiliserse0
- Outcome
- content of Cr, Li, and Se in strawe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both fertilisers increased the content of Cr, Li, and Se in straw.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar multi-compound fertilizers are recommended for optimizing crop yield and quality.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- use of foliar multi-compound fertilisers is a beneficial choice for optimising crop yield and qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of foliar multi-compound fertilisers is a beneficial choice for optimising crop yield and quality.”
t0“Triticale”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
fertilization · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.