Paper · 2022 · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts

PHOSPHATE-SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE GROWTH AND METABOLISM OF PISUM SATIVUM L. IN KODAIKANAL HILLS, TAMIL NADU.

U. Muthuvel; Harinathan B.; Suresh K.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Compared with the other major nutrients, phosphorus is by far the least mobile and available to plants in most soil conditions. Although phosphorus is abundant in soils in both organic and inorganic forms, it is frequently a major or even the prime limiting factor for plant growth. To circumvent phosphorus deficiency, phosphate-solubilising bacteria (PSB) would play an important role in supplying phosphate to plants in a more environmentally-friendly and sustainable manner. The organisms with phosphate-solubilising potential will increase the availability of soluble phosphate and will enhance plant growth. In this present study, the phosphate solubilising microorganisms isolated from different soil samples from Kodaikanal Hills were identified on Pikovskaya agar plates with clear zone around the colonies. From the observation the strain-I and strain-II identified as Psedumonas aureginosa and Bacillus megaterium. Both strains showed higher than 180 (phosphate solubilisation efficiency), and reduced PH from 8.0 to below 6.0 indicates high phosphate solubilising efficiency, increased organic acid production. The influence of this phosphate solubilises on the growth and metabolism of Pea Plants were analysed. According to the results obtained from comparative field trial conducted in Kodaikanal Hills, use of PSB bio fertilizer shows marked difference in soil fertility, better performance in yield and yield related characteristics observed in the field of pea plants. (Pisum sativum L)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two phosphate-solubilizing strains were identified as Psedumonas aureginosa and Bacillus megaterium.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Outcome
Psedumonas aureginosa and Bacillus megateriume0

Verbatim

e0

“the strain-I and strain-II identified as Psedumonas aureginosa and Bacillus megaterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains had phosphate solubilisation efficiency above 180.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Outcome
phosphate solubilisation efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
180e0

Verbatim

e0

“Both strains showed higher than 180 (phosphate solubilisation efficiency)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains reduced pH from 8.0 to below 6.0.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Outcome
PHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
below 6.0e0
Qualifier
8.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“reduced PH from 8.0 to below 6.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains showed increased organic acid production.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Outcome
organic acid productione0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“increased organic acid production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB bio fertilizer improved soil fertility in a comparative pea field trial.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Treatment
PSB bio fertilizere0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Setting
Kodaikanal Hillse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“comparative field trial conducted in Kodaikanal Hills, use of PSB bio fertilizer shows marked difference in soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB bio fertilizer improved pea yield and yield related characteristics in the field trial.

Taxon
PISUM SATIVUM L.t0
Treatment
PSB bio fertilizere0
Outcome
yield and yield related characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“use of PSB bio fertilizer shows marked difference in soil fertility, better performance in yield and yield related characteristics observed in the field of pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“PISUM SATIVUM L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

127 papers: 108 positive, 19 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.