Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Positive properties of a biological preparation based on the consortium genus bacillus

Vyacheslav Timofeev

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe. A fungicidal seed protectant, a bacterial preparation BP (Bacillus simplex / B. Megaterium consortium, secondary metabolites, titer 108 Coe/ml), Biocoal were studied. When treating seeds, plant development was 7 days higher than control when using BP at a rate of 2.5 l/t, where an increase in sprout length by 1.25 cm was noted. When applying the drug to day-old seedlings, the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect with an increase in the length of the sprout by 3.2-4.2 cm, a decrease in the population of pathogenic fungi in seeds at the level of 60%, stimulating effect on root length by 1.7 cm, sprout length by 1.5 cm and germination by 6-8%. The use of a bacterial preparation during seed treatment did not affect the reduction of crop root disease. Measuring plant development parameters in the tillering phase, BP with a rate of 1.5 l/t had a greater effect on the length of the upper leaf, exceeding the control by 1-2 cm. The development of morphometric parameters of the flag leaf in the filling phase - milky ripeness had a leaf length of 18-23 cm with a width of 1.0-1.2 cm, with an increase at BP rates of 2.5-5.0 l/t. For seed treatment options, the impact at this stage is minimal or absent. Taking into account biometric indicators of the mass of formed plant organs showed an excess of indicators for BP options in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t when treating seeds and using them during the growing season. Structural analysis of the ear determined a significant excess of the results of the preparations used during the growing season; the weight of 1000 grains was higher by 2-3 g when the seeds were treated with a chemical disinfectant and using BP at rates of 2.5-5.0 l/t. The crop yield increased by 0.1 t/ha in variants with a rate of bacterial preparation BP of 2.5-5.0 l/t in its pure form.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with BP at 2.5 l/t made wheat plant development 7 days higher than control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP at a rate of 2.5 l/te1
Outcome
plant developmente1
Direction
7 days highere1
Value
7 dayse1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
northern forest-steppee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“When treating seeds, plant development was 7 days higher than control when using BP at a rate of 2.5 l/t, where an increase in sprout length by 1.25 cm was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with BP at 2.5 l/t increased wheat sprout length by 1.25 cm.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP at a rate of 2.5 l/te1
Outcome
sprout lengthe1
Direction
an increasee1
Value
1.25 cme1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
northern forest-steppee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“When treating seeds, plant development was 7 days higher than control when using BP at a rate of 2.5 l/t, where an increase in sprout length by 1.25 cm was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Day-old wheat seedlings treated with BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t had sprout length increased by 3.2-4.2 cm.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te1
Outcome
length of the sproute1
Direction
an increasee1
Value
3.2-4.2 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect with an increase in the length of the sprout by 3.2-4.2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t decreased the population of pathogenic fungi in wheat seeds by 60%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te1
Interactor
pathogenic fungie2pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus simplex / B. Megaterium consortiume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population of pathogenic fungi in seedse2
Direction
a decreasee2
Value
60%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–638 · show in text ↑
e2

“a decrease in the population of pathogenic fungi in seeds at the level of 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–776 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bacillus simplex / B. Megaterium consortium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t stimulated wheat root length by 1.7 cm.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te1
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
stimulating effecte2
Value
1.7 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–638 · show in text ↑
e2

“stimulating effect on root length by 1.7 cm, sprout length by 1.5 cm and germination by 6-8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t stimulated wheat germination by 6-8%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te1
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
stimulating effecte2
Value
6-8%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–638 · show in text ↑
e2

“stimulating effect on root length by 1.7 cm, sprout length by 1.5 cm and germination by 6-8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t stimulated wheat sprout length by 1.5 cm.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te1
Outcome
sprout lengthe2
Direction
stimulating effecte2
Value
1.5 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of BP variants in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t had a greater effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–638 · show in text ↑
e2

“stimulating effect on root length by 1.7 cm, sprout length by 1.5 cm and germination by 6-8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial preparation applied during seed treatment did not affect the reduction of crop root disease.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
a bacterial preparation during seed treatmente3
Outcome
the reduction of crop root diseasee3
Direction
did not affecte3

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e3

“The use of a bacterial preparation during seed treatment did not affect the reduction of crop root disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP at 1.5 l/t had a greater effect on wheat upper leaf length, exceeding the control by 1-2 cm in the tillering phase.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP with a rate of 1.5 l/te4
Outcome
length of the upper leafe4
Direction
exceedinge4
Value
1-2 cme4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e4

“BP with a rate of 1.5 l/t had a greater effect on the length of the upper leaf, exceeding the control by 1-2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP at 2.5-5.0 l/t increased flag leaf length to 18-23 cm and width to 1.0-1.2 cm at milky ripeness.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
flag leafe5
Treatment
BP rates of 2.5-5.0 l/te5
Outcome
leaf lengthe5
Direction
an increasee5
Value
18-23 cme5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e5

“The development of morphometric parameters of the flag leaf in the filling phase - milky ripeness had a leaf length of 18-23 cm with a width of 1.0-1.2 cm, with an increase at BP rates of 2.5-5.0 l/t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The impact of seed treatment on wheat at the filling phase is minimal or absent.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
filling phasee5
Treatment
seed treatmente6
Outcome
impact at this stagee6
Direction
minimal or absente6

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e6

“For seed treatment options, the impact at this stage is minimal or absent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1430 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the filling phase - milky ripeness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BP in pure form or with biochar at 5.0 l/t showed an excess of biometric mass of formed plant organs when used on seeds and during the growing season.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP options in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/te7
Outcome
mass of formed plant organse7
Direction
excesse7

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e7

“Taking into account biometric indicators of the mass of formed plant organs showed an excess of indicators for BP options in pure form and with biochar at a rate of 5.0 l/t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using BP at 2.5-5.0 l/t raised the weight of 1000 grains by 2-3 g compared with chemical disinfectant.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BP at rates of 2.5-5.0 l/te2
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse2
Direction
highere2
Value
2-3 ge2
Comparator
chemical disinfectante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“the weight of 1000 grains was higher by 2-3 g when the seeds were treated with a chemical disinfectant and using BP at rates of 2.5-5.0 l/t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial preparation BP at 2.5-5.0 l/t in pure form increased crop yield by 0.1 t/ha.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
bacterial preparation BP of 2.5-5.0 l/t in its pure forme1
Outcome
crop yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.1 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment to study the use of a biological preparation was carried out on spring wheat in plot experiments in the conditions of the northern forest-steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“The crop yield increased by 0.1 t/ha in variants with a rate of bacterial preparation BP of 2.5-5.0 l/t in its pure form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–2058 · show in text ↑

biochar · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.