Paper · 2017 · Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

Effects of Biochar Application on Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Roots Under Long-term Drought Conditions

Zdenek Svoboda; Jaroslav Záhora; Helena Dvořáčková

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The main objective of this paper was to evaluate the effect of applying biochar and activated carbon on winter wheat affected by drought in model laboratory conditions. Cultivation tests of the soil-microorganisms-plant (winter wheat) system were focused on understanding the interactions between microbial soil communities and experimental plants in response to specific cultivation measures, in combination with the modelled effect of drought. The containers were formed as a split-root rhizotron. In this container experiment, the root system of one and the same plant was divided into two separate compartments where into one half, biochar or activated carbon has been added. The other half without additives was a control. Plants favoured the formation of the root system in the treated part of the container under both drought and irrigation modes. In drought mode there was lower production of CO2, lower overall length and surface of the roots of winter wheat compared to variants in irrigation mode. The application of biochar and activated carbon, therefore, supported the colonization of roots by mycorrhiza in general. The Scientific merit of this paper was to investigate the possibility of mitigating the effects of a long-term drought on winter wheat through the application of biochar or the application of activated carbon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat developed more roots in the amended half of split containers under both water regimes.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treated part of the containere0
Outcome
formation of the root systeme0
Direction
favourede0
Comparator
under both drought and irrigation modese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants favoured the formation of the root system in the treated part of the container under both drought and irrigation modes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered carbon dioxide production relative to irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
drought modee0
Outcome
production of CO2e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
irrigation modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In drought mode there was lower production of CO2, lower overall length and surface of the roots of winter wheat compared to variants in irrigation mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered wheat root length and surface relative to irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
drought modee0
Outcome
length and surface of the rootse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
irrigation modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In drought mode there was lower production of CO2, lower overall length and surface of the roots of winter wheat compared to variants in irrigation mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar supported mycorrhizal colonization of wheat roots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
biochare0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
colonization of roots by mycorrhizae0
Direction
supportede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biochar and activated carbon, therefore, supported the colonization of roots by mycorrhiza in general”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Activated carbon supported mycorrhizal colonization of wheat roots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
activated carbone0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
colonization of roots by mycorrhizae0
Direction
supportede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biochar and activated carbon, therefore, supported the colonization of roots by mycorrhiza in general”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–75 · show in text ↑

biochar · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.