Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

THE FEATURES OF CULTIVATION TECHNOLOGY OF MAIZE HYBRID ‘MASHUK 250SV’ FOR GRAIN

V. N. Bagrintseva; I. A. Shmalko; I. N. Ivashenenko; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The article gives the analysis of experimental date, obtained in the trials of ARRI of maize in the sufficiently moisturized region of Stavropol Kray in the years of 2005-2015. The object of study was the middle early maize hybrid ‘Mashuk 250SV’. During the plot-trials we studied the effect of the elements of cultivation technology (tillage, sowing term, density of stand, fertilizing, herbicides) on the productivity of hybrid grain. It has been established that the molding plowing on the depth of 22-25 cm in the autumn supplies the higher yield of grain, than the surface tillage (disc plowing) on 10-12 cm. The grain productivity reduced on 7.3% when the technology of plowing was changed from the moldboard treatment into the surface one. The pre-sowing fertilizing with N30 P30 K30 was the most efficient after the moldboard plowing than after the disc plowing. The grain productivity on the fertilized soil plowed with a moldboard was higher on 9.2% than on the soil plowed with a disc. The pre- sowing nitrogen fertilizing of N60 increased the grain productivity on 0.42t/ha. You can sow the hybrid in the period of 15-30 April, but the sowings in the middle of April give the greatest yield of grain. It has been determined that the best density of plant stand is 70.000 pieces per ha. To protect the yields from the weeds you can use the following postemergence herbicides: ‘MayesTer (0.15kg/ha), the grain productivity increase was 32.1%; ‘TitusPlus’ (0.35kg/ha), the grain productivity increase was 38.8%; ‘Kassius’ (0.04kg/ha) with Aminopelik’ (0.6 l/ha), the grain productivity increase was 33.8%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing yielded more grain than surface tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
molding plowing on the depth of 22-25 cme0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
surface tillage (disc plowing) on 10-12 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the molding plowing on the depth of 22-25 cm in the autumn supplies the higher yield of grain, than the surface tillage (disc plowing) on 10-12 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Switching to surface tillage reduced grain productivity by 7.3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
surface onee0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.3%e0
Comparator
moldboard treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain productivity reduced on 7.3% when the technology of plowing was changed from the moldboard treatment into the surface one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N30 P30 K30 fertilization yielded 9.2% more grain with moldboard than disc plowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
fertilized soil plowed with a moldboarde0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.2%e0
Comparator
soil plowed with a disce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain productivity on the fertilized soil plowed with a moldboard was higher on 9.2% than on the soil plowed with a disc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-sowing N60 increased grain productivity by 0.42t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
pre- sowing nitrogen fertilizing of N60e0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.42t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre- sowing nitrogen fertilizing of N60 increased the grain productivity on 0.42t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-April sowing gave the greatest grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
sowings in the middle of Aprile0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sowings in the middle of April give the greatest yield of grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best plant stand density was 70.000 pieces per ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Outcome
best density of plant stande0
Value
70.000 pieces per hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best density of plant stand is 70.000 pieces per ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MayesTer increased grain productivity by 32.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
MayesTer (0.15kg/ha)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To protect the yields from the weeds you can use the following postemergence herbicides: ‘MayesTer (0.15kg/ha), the grain productivity increase was 32.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TitusPlus increased grain productivity by 38.8%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
TitusPlus’ (0.35kg/ha)e0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘TitusPlus’ (0.35kg/ha), the grain productivity increase was 38.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kassius with Aminopelik increased grain productivity by 33.8%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0t0
Treatment
Kassius’ (0.04kg/ha) with Aminopelik’ (0.6 l/ha)e0
Outcome
grain productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Kassius’ (0.04kg/ha) with Aminopelik’ (0.6 l/ha), the grain productivity increase was 33.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.