Paper · 2024 · Malaysian Applied Biology

The Susceptibility of Malaysian Rice Brands To Sitophilus oryzae and The Potential Application of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles For Control Purposes

Nurin Nazifa Syanizam; Siti Khadijah Mohd Bakhori; Siti Nasuha Hamzah

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae, is an insect pest that can pose severe harm to stored grains. Rice weevils, both adults and larvae, cause significant economic losses because they can infest a wide range of plants and stored goods. Nanoparticle insecticides are created and studied to replace the overly-used synthetic chemical insecticides. The purpose of this study is to investigate the susceptibility of several commercialized rice brands towards S. oryzae infestation and to assess the toxicity of different types of zinc oxide (ZnO) against S. oryzae. The study involved twelve rice brands, and S. oryzae infestation rates were observed in the laboratory for 17 weeks. The infestation rates were obtained at the end of the observation period. To obtain the required dosages of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8% (w/w), four different concentrations of each type of ZnO nanoparticle that had undergone various reactivity modifications were mixed with rice for bioassays test. S. oryzae has been proven to be susceptible to almost all commercialized rice brands studied in this research. Based on the data, it can be concluded that the ZnO nanoparticle modified with gamma-ray is the most effective at controlling S. oryzae, as 100% mortality was seen after three days of treatment at concentrations between 0.4 to 0.08% (w/w). The slow emergence of pests in monitored rice brands is attributed to the protectants and their residue, which work by eradicating eggs and adults that have consumed the grain. Zinc oxide type 7A is the most toxic towards S. oryzae because of its exposure to gamma-ray which has the highest energy compared to neutron and beta rays. This results in the release of more active molecules to act on the pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nearly all studied rice brands were susceptible to S. oryzae.

Interactor
S. oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee0pest
Outcome
susceptible to almost all commercialized rice brandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. oryzae has been proven to be susceptible to almost all commercialized rice brands studied in this research.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma ray modified ZnO gave 100% S. oryzae mortality after three days.

Treatment
ZnO nanoparticle modified with gamma-raye0
Interactor
S. oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee0pest
Outcome
S. oryzaee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after three days of treatment at concentrations between 0.4 to 0.08% (w/w)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnO nanoparticle modified with gamma-ray is the most effective at controlling S. oryzae, as 100% mortality was seen after three days of treatment at concentrations between 0.4 to 0.08% (w/w).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1323 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed slow pest emergence to grain protectant residues.

Outcome
slow emergence of pestse0
Qualifier
protectants and their residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slow emergence of pests in monitored rice brands is attributed to the protectants and their residue, which work by eradicating eggs and adults that have consumed the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1500 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc oxide type 7A was considered most toxic to S. oryzae due to gamma ray exposure.

Treatment
Zinc oxide type 7Ae0
Interactor
S. oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee0pest
Outcome
most toxic towards S. oryzaee0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc oxide type 7A is the most toxic towards S. oryzae because of its exposure to gamma-ray which has the highest energy compared to neutron and beta rays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1656 · show in text ↑

radiation · Sitophilus oryzae · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · Sitophilus oryzae · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.