Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Application of Ethephon Manually or via Drone Enforces Bud Dormancy and Enhances Flowering Response to Chilling in Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)

Bingyi Wen; Cailian Deng; Qi Tian; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ethephon (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) is frequently used for flush management in order to maximize flowering in litchi. However, the optimal dosage of ethephon, which balances between flush control effect and the detrimental effect on leaves, is unknown. This study aimed to identify the optimal ethephon dosage and test more efficient ethephon application methods, using a drone for flush control and flowering promotion in litchi. The effects of a single manual full-tree spray of 250, 500 or 1000 mg/L of ethephon in early November on the bud break rate, leaf drop rate, net photosynthetic rate, LcFT1 expression and floral induction (panicle emergence rate and panicle number) in ‘Jingganghongnuo’ litchi were examined in the season of 2021–2022. In the season of 2022–2023, the effects of drone application of 1000 mg/L of ethephon in early November on bud growth and floral induction were observed. The results showed that the manual ethephon treatments were effective at enforcing bud dormancy and elongating the dormancy period and that the effects were positively dependent on dosage. One manual spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon in late autumn enabled a dormancy period of 6 weeks. The treatments advanced seasonal abscission of old leaves in winter and caused short-term suppression on photosynthesis within 2 weeks after treatment. Ethephon treatments, especially at 1000 mg/L, enhanced the expression of LcFT1 in the mature leaves and promoted floral induction reflected by earlier panicle emergence and increased panicle emergence rate and number in the terminal shoot. The floral promotion effect was also positively dosage dependent. The cumulative chilling hours below 15 °C from the date of treatment to the occurrence of a 20% panicle emergence rate were lowered in ethephon treatments. A drone spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon solution consumed a sixth of the manual spray solution volume and was two thirds less effective in suppressing bud break compared with manual spraying. However, it achieved a significant flowering promotion effect comparable to traditional manual spraying. The results suggest that ethephon application enhanced flowering responsiveness to chilling as well as enforced bud dormancy. The application of ethephon with a drone proved to be an efficient method for flush control and flower promotion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual ethephon enforced bud dormancy and lengthened its duration in a dose-dependent manner.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
manual ethephon treatmentse0
Outcome
bud dormancy and elongating the dormancy periode0
Direction
elongatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the manual ethephon treatments were effective at enforcing bud dormancy and elongating the dormancy period and that the effects were positively dependent on dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One 1000 mg/L manual spray gave six weeks of dormancy.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
One manual spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephone0
Outcome
dormancy periode0
Value
6 weekse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One manual spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon in late autumn enabled a dormancy period of 6 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon advanced old-leaf abscission.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
The treatmentse0
Outcome
seasonal abscission of old leavese0
Direction
advancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments advanced seasonal abscission of old leaves in winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon briefly suppressed photosynthesis within two weeks.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
suppressione0
Qualifier
within 2 weeks after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused short-term suppression on photosynthesis within 2 weeks after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon, especially at 1000 mg/L, enhanced LcFT1 expression in mature leaves.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Organ / stage
mature leavese0
Treatment
Ethephon treatments, especially at 1000 mg/Le0
Gene
LcFT1e0
Outcome
expression of LcFT1e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon treatments, especially at 1000 mg/L, enhanced the expression of LcFT1 in the mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon advanced panicle emergence.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
Ethephon treatmentse0e1
Outcome
panicle emergencee0e1
Direction
earliere0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoted floral induction reflected by earlier panicle emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ethephon treatments, especially at 1000 mg/L, enhanced the expression of LcFT1 in the mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased panicle emergence rate and number, with a positive dose response.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Organ / stage
terminal shoote0
Outcome
panicle emergence rate and numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased panicle emergence rate and number in the terminal shoot. The floral promotion effect was also positively dosage dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon lowered chilling hours needed to reach 20% panicle emergence.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
ethephon treatmentse0
Outcome
cumulative chilling hourse0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
below 15 °C from the date of treatment to the occurrence of a 20% panicle emergence ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative chilling hours below 15 °C from the date of treatment to the occurrence of a 20% panicle emergence rate were lowered in ethephon treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drone spraying used one sixth of the solution volume of manual spraying.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
A drone spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon solutione0
Outcome
solution volumee0
Direction
a sixthe0
Value
a sixthe0
Comparator
manual spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A drone spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon solution consumed a sixth of the manual spray solution volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drone spraying was two thirds less effective at suppressing bud break than manual spraying.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Treatment
A drone spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon solutione0e1
Outcome
suppressing bud breake0e1
Direction
less effectivee0e1
Value
two thirdse0e1
Comparator
manual sprayinge0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was two thirds less effective in suppressing bud break compared with manual spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1994 · show in text ↑
e1

“A drone spray of 1000 mg/L of ethephon solution consumed a sixth of the manual spray solution volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drone spraying significantly promoted flowering comparably to manual spraying.

Taxon
LitchiLitchit0
Outcome
flowering promotion effecte0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
traditional manual sprayinge0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it achieved a significant flowering promotion effect comparable to traditional manual spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–146 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · LitchiPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · LitchiPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: expression · LitchiResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · LitchiPositive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.