Abstract
Foliar nutrition is aimed to eliminate the problems of fixation and immobilization of nutrients. Hence, foliar nutrition is being recognized as a significant way of fertilizing modern agriculture, especially under rainfed conditions. Nano fertilizers because of smaller size and higher surface area are efficient as compared to conventional and produce better results when used in combined form. The experiment was laid out in Randomized complete block design with three replications. A field experiment was conducted in black clayey at Agricultural Research Station, Dhadesugur, during Kharif 2023. There were eight treatment combinations, consisting of different levels of conventional and nano fertilizers. RDF - 150:75:75 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and 50 % of N, entire P and K were applied as basal and remaining 50 % of N was top dressed at tillering and panicle initiation stage. RNR- 15048 variety of transplanted rice. Application of 50 % Rec. N with soil application + 50 % Rec. N through nano urea with two applications (at tillering and panicle initiation stage) + Rec. P & K with soil application recorded significantly higher number of green leaves, leaf area and leaf area index at harvest (52.7, 954.8 cm2 plant-1 and 4.77, respectively). It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1). Nutrient content and uptake also showed higher values for the same treatment. Combined application of conventional and nano fertilizers helped to increase growth, growth attributes like number of leaves, leaf area, leaf area index, yield attributes, yield, nutrient content and nutrient uptake of transplanted rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Combined soil and nano urea treatment produced more green leaves, 52.7.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- 50 % Rec. N with soil application + 50 % Rec. N through nano urea with two applications (at tillering and panicle initiation stage) + Rec. P & K with soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of green leavese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 52.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 50 % Rec. N with soil application + 50 % Rec. N through nano urea with two applications (at tillering and panicle initiation stage) + Rec. P & K with soil application recorded significantly higher number of green leaves, leaf area and leaf area index at harvest (52.7, 954.8 cm2 plant-1 and 4.77, respectively)”
t0“Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced higher leaf area of 954.8 cm2 plant-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- nano ureat0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 954.8 cm2 plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded significantly higher number of green leaves, leaf area and leaf area index at harvest (52.7, 954.8 cm2 plant-1 and 4.77, respectively)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced higher leaf area index of 4.77.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recorded significantly higher number of green leaves, leaf area and leaf area index at harvest (52.7, 954.8 cm2 plant-1 and 4.77, respectively)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced panicle length of 20.1 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced 242.3 grains per panicle.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nano Ureat0
- Outcome
- number of grains panicle-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 242.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced panicle weight of 3.73 g plant-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nano Ureat0
- Outcome
- panicle weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.73 g plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced test weight of 19.1 g.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced grain yield of 5578 kg ha-1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also produced higher panicle length (20.1 cm), number of grains panicle-1 (242.3), panicle weight (3.73 g plant-1), test weight (19.1 g) and grain yield (5578 kg ha-1)”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment increased nutrient content and uptake.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Nano Ureat0
- Outcome
- Nutrient content and uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nutrient content and uptake also showed higher values for the same treatment”
t0“Nano Urea and Nano DAP on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
198 papers more in this group
See all 202 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
460 papers more in this group
See all 464 papers →nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →nanoparticle · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.