Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Evaluation of Co-toxicity Coefficient for Combined Impact of Botanicals with Spinosad against Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus in stored Blackgram

Maharaj Satwika; Tirumalasetty Madhumathi; Bhimineni Ratna Kumari; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Blackgram is an important pulse crop in India, but storage pests such as Callosobruchus maculatus can cause severe damage. Synthetic insecticides are commonly used to manage these pests, but mixing them with food grains is not recommended. Instead, safer alternatives like botanicals can be used. However, botanical powders have a short post-application duration, which reduces their effectiveness. To enhance their efficacy, spinosad can be combined with botanical powders, resulting in a cost-effective and long-lasting solution. This study aims to evaluate the toxicity of this combination against C. maculatus. Methods: Botanicals like sweet flag powder and neem kernel powder were used in the experiment. Spinosad was mixed with these treatments and was used for the bio-assay with one-day-old adults of C. maculatus by mixing with blackgram seed. Mortality data were recorded at 1,2,3,5 and 7 days after the release of the test insect to calculate LD50 and other parameters for botanicals in combination with spinosad. Result: The highest co-toxicity coefficient was recorded for sweet flag powder (141.17) than neem kernel powder. Compared to neem kernel powder, sweet flag powder enhanced the mortality rate when combined with spinosad. Hence, a combination of sweet flag powder and spinosad is recommended for the control of C. maculatus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet flag powder had a higher co-toxicity coefficient than neem kernel powder.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
sweet flag powdere0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
co-toxicity coefficiente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
141.17e0
Comparator
neem kernel powdere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest co-toxicity coefficient was recorded for sweet flag powder (141.17) than neem kernel powder.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Callosobruchus maculatus in stored Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet flag powder with spinosad increased beetle mortality relative to neem kernel powder.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
sweet flag powdere0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
mortality ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
combined with spinosade0
Comparator
neem kernel powdere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to neem kernel powder, sweet flag powder enhanced the mortality rate when combined with spinosad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Callosobruchus maculatus in stored Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sweet flag powder with spinosad to control C. maculatus.

Taxon
BlackgramVigna mungot0
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
combination of sweet flag powder and spinosad is recommended for the control of C. maculatuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, a combination of sweet flag powder and spinosad is recommended for the control of C. maculatus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–152 · show in text ↑

Acorus calamus · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.