Paper · 2023 · Journal of Entomological Research

Biopesticidal efficacy of Ricinus communis Linnaeus and Achyranthes aspera Linnaeus against bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting blackgram

D.R. Thakur; Savita Kumari; Rajesh Kumar

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

AbstractThe biopesticidal efficacy of locally available plants, arandi, Ricinus communis and puthkanda, Achyranthes aspera was evaluated against Callosobruchus maculatus infesting black gram, Vigna mungo in storage. The extracts of leaves, stem and seeds of both plants were made in acetone and methanol to evaluate the efficacy on adult deaths, fecundity and F1 generation. The death was counted after every 24 h upto 100% eradication of weevils. The methanol extract of R. communis seeds showed 100% mortality on 5th day and acetone extract of A. aspera stem reported 100% deaths after one week at 20% concentration. R. communis seeds extract and A. aspera stem extract proved to be potentially effective in controlling C. maculatus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extract of Ricinus seeds caused 100% bruchid mortality on day five.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe1
Treatment
methanol extract of R. communis seedse0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
mortalitye0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The methanol extract of R. communis seeds showed 100% mortality on 5th day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“Callosobruchus maculatus infesting black gram, Vigna mungo in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract of Achyranthes stem caused 100% bruchid mortality after one week at 20% concentration.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe1
Treatment
acetone extract of A. aspera steme0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
deathse0
Direction
deathse0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after one week at 20% concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetone extract of A. aspera stem reported 100% deaths after one week at 20% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“Callosobruchus maculatus infesting black gram, Vigna mungo in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–215 · show in text ↑

Ricinus communis · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.