Abstract
The present study aimed to assess okra powdery mildew (Erysiphe Cichoracearum DC) by using bio-agents and chemical fungicides. Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench occupies a prominent place in the horticultural wealth and economy of the country. Powdery mildew disease on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench incited by fungus, Erysiphe cichoracearum is a limiting factor in the successful cultivation in Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh. Studies were carried out to find out disease management strategies against okra powdery mildew using bioagents and chemical fungicides. Disease incidence declined after first, second and third sprays. The fungicide Hexaconazole (Contaf 5% EC) @ 0.1%, showed significantly lowest disease incidence (19.53 %) with maximum (68.40 %) disease control. On the basis of effectiveness in controlling the powdery mildew disease of okra the most effective fungicides recorded in the order of merit were Carbendazim (Bavistin 50WP) @0.1%, Propiconazole (Tilt 25EC) @0.1%, Trichoderma viride (3 %), Sulphur (Sulfex 80% WP) @ 0.3%, Pseudomonas flouresens (4 %) and Trichoderma harizum (4 %).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Disease incidence declined after successive sprays.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- first, second and third sprayse0
- Outcome
- Disease incidencee0
- Direction
- declinede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Disease incidence declined after first, second and third sprays”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole had 19.53% incidence.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Hexaconazole (Contaf 5% EC) @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 19.53 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Hexaconazole (Contaf 5% EC) @ 0.1%, showed significantly lowest disease incidence (19.53 %) with maximum (68.40 %) disease control”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole achieved 68.40% disease control.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Hexaconazole (Contaf 5% EC) @ 0.1%e0
- Outcome
- disease controle0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 68.40 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Hexaconazole (Contaf 5% EC) @ 0.1%, showed significantly lowest disease incidence (19.53 %) with maximum (68.40 %) disease control”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbendazim ranked first among remaining treatments.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Carbendazim (Bavistin 50WP) @0.1%e0
- Outcome
- most effective fungicidese0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the most effective fungicides recorded in the order of merit were Carbendazim (Bavistin 50WP) @0.1%, Propiconazole (Tilt 25EC) @0.1%, Trichoderma viride (3 %), Sulphur (Sulfex 80% WP) @ 0.3%, Pseudomonas flouresens (4 %) and Trichoderma harizum (4 %)”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
hexaconazole · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.