Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Water Management

Ridge–furrow with plastic film mulching in combination with reduced nitrogen application rate improves water productivity and yield of sunflower in dry semi–humid regions

Bing Jing; Li Xiong; Weiqing Fu; et al.

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Ridge–furrow with plastic film mulching (RFPFM) is quite successful under dryland agriculture. However, its suitability for sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) production with different plastic film mulching techniques such as ridge–furrow fully covered with plastic film mulching (FM) and half mulching (HM), in combination with appropriate nitrogen (N) fertilizer management remains uncertain. The current research investigated the performance of sunflower crop under three planting patterns (HM, FM and CP, i.e., conventional planting on flat land without plastic film mulching) and two N doses (120 and 240 kg N ha –1 ) in northwest China. The objectives were to evaluate the soil hydrothermal conditions, crop performance, water productivity (WP), N harvest index (NHI) and seed yield, under different combinations of these treatments. The results showed that both HM and FM had 1.8 °C higher topsoil temperature during seedling stage and soil moisture (+21 % and +30 %) during the whole growth stage, respectively, when compared to CP. The favorable hydrothermal conditions under HM and FM accelerated the seedling emergence and shortened the crop growth duration by nearly 5 days, and further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP. A comparison between FM and HM treatments did not show a significant increase in WP or yield for the former, despite improved soil hydrothermal conditions. In addition, increasing N application rate from 120 to 240 kg N ha –1 did not lead to a consistent and significant effect on total N uptake, WP and seed yield. Overall, the present study suggests that HM, when coupled with a reduced N dose, can replace FM in sunflower production. This approach reduces the use of plastic film and N fertilizer, while efficiently conserving water, enhancing WP and improving seed yield of sunflower under dry and semi–humid conditions. • Plastic mulching enhanced sunflower yield and water productivity due to improved soil moisture. • The higher N application rate did not increase sunflower yield and water productivity. • The yield of half mulched ridge-furrow plots (HM) was at par with fully mulched ridge-furrows. • HM can be recommended to reduce plastic film usage without compromising yield or water productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM and FM increased topsoil temperature by 1.8 °C relative to CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
both HM and FMe0
Outcome
topsoil temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.8 °Ce0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both HM and FM had 1.8 °C higher topsoil temperature during seedling stage and soil moisture (+21 % and +30 %) during the whole growth stage, respectively, when compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM increased soil moisture by 21% relative to CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HMe0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
+21 %e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both HM and FM had 1.8 °C higher topsoil temperature during seedling stage and soil moisture (+21 % and +30 %) during the whole growth stage, respectively, when compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FM increased soil moisture by 30% relative to CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
+30 %e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both HM and FM had 1.8 °C higher topsoil temperature during seedling stage and soil moisture (+21 % and +30 %) during the whole growth stage, respectively, when compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM and FM accelerated sunflower seedling emergence relative to CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HM and FMe0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The favorable hydrothermal conditions under HM and FM accelerated the seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM and FM shortened crop growth duration by nearly five days.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HM and FMe0
Outcome
crop growth duratione0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
nearly 5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HM and FM accelerated the seedling emergence and shortened the crop growth duration by nearly 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM increased sunflower seed yield by 23% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HMe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+23e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FM increased sunflower seed yield by 33% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
FMe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+33 %e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM increased water productivity by 26% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HMe1
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+26e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FM increased water productivity by 36% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
FMe1
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+36 %e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM increased nitrogen uptake by 20% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
HMe1
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+20e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FM increased nitrogen uptake by 24% versus CP.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
FMe1
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+24 %e0
Comparator
CPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further improved seed yield (+23 and +33 %), WP (+26 and +36 %), and N uptake (+20 and +24 %), compared to CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“under HM and FM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FM did not significantly increase WP or yield over HM.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
WP or yielde0
Direction
did not show a significant increasee0
Comparator
HMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comparison between FM and HM treatments did not show a significant increase in WP or yield for the former”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen from 120 to 240 kg N ha –1 had no consistent significant effect on uptake, WP or yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
increasing N application rate from 120 to 240 kg N ha –1e0
Outcome
total N uptake, WP and seed yielde0
Direction
did not lead to a consistent and significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N application rate from 120 to 240 kg N ha –1 did not lead to a consistent and significant effect on total N uptake, WP and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend HM with reduced nitrogen as a replacement for FM in sunflower production.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
HM, when coupled with a reduced N dosee0
Outcome
HM, when coupled with a reduced N dose, can replace FMe0
Comparator
FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HM, when coupled with a reduced N dose, can replace FM in sunflower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1736 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–144 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mulching · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.