Paper · 2024 · Advances in Research

Prevalence of Bacterial Leaf Blight in Rice Across Andhra Pradesh and In vitro Assessment of Silver and Copper Nanoparticles against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae

Vineetha. G; M. Pradeep; P.N Harathi; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bacterial leaf blight is one of the most destructive diseases in rice which leads to yield loss of 20-40%. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of bacterial leaf blight in rice across Andhra Pradesh. A roving survey was conducted during Kharif 2023 in Andhra Pradesh to assess the severity of bacterial leaf blight disease in rice. The percent disease index averages from 25 to 59.6% was recorded. The maximum disease severity was observed in the tillering stage. The maximum percent disease index was observed in Chinta reddy Palem village in Nellore district (59.60%), while the minimum was recorded in Denduluru village in Eluru district (25%). The disease was more severe in the BPT-5204 variety. In spite chemical control, there are chances of development of resistance. There is a need for nanotechnology intervention for management of disease. This study also investigates the antimicrobial activity of copper and silver nanoparticles against Xoo by using paper disc diffusion method under invitro conditions. Silver nanoparticles exhibited the highest anti-microbial activity when compared with copper nanoparticles at 0.1% and 0.2% concentrations, respectively. Further research is needed to explore the field application of nanoparticles and their long-term effects on rice crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial leaf blight disease index averaged 25 to 59.6% across surveyed rice locations.

Outcome
percent disease indexe0
Value
25 to 59.6%e0
Setting
Andhra Pradeshe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent disease index averages from 25 to 59.6% was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–401 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial leaf blight disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–335 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice across Andhra Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial blight severity was greatest at rice tillering.

Organ / stage
tillering stagee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum disease severity was observed in the tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial leaf blight disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinta reddy Palem had the highest disease index at 59.60%.

Outcome
percent disease indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
59.60%e0
Setting
Chinta reddy Palem village in Nellore districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum percent disease index was observed in Chinta reddy Palem village in Nellore district (59.60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial leaf blight disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Denduluru had the lowest disease index at 25%.

Outcome
percent disease indexe1
Direction
minimume0
Value
25%e0
Setting
Denduluru village in Eluru districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum was recorded in Denduluru village in Eluru district (25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum percent disease index was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–515 · show in text ↑
e2

“bacterial leaf blight disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial leaf blight was more severe in BPT-5204.

Material
BPT-5204e0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
more severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The disease was more severe in the BPT-5204 variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial leaf blight disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticles showed greater in vitro antimicrobial activity against Xoo than copper nanoparticles at the stated concentrations.

Treatment
Silver nanoparticlese0
Interactor
Xooe1pathogen
Outcome
anti-microbial activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
0.1% and 0.2% concentrations, respectivelye0
Comparator
copper nanoparticlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silver nanoparticles exhibited the highest anti-microbial activity when compared with copper nanoparticles at 0.1% and 0.2% concentrations, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“activity of copper and silver nanoparticles against Xoo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for field research on nanoparticle use and long-term rice effects.

Outcome
field application of nanoparticles and their long-term effects on rice cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further research is needed to explore the field application of nanoparticles and their long-term effects on rice crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1294 · show in text ↑

silver nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.