Paper · 2024 · Journal of the ASABE

A Statistical Approach to Understanding How Inter-Kernel Moisture Content Variability Affects Rice Quality

Kaushik Luthra; Abass Oduola; Alan Vazquez; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Highlights Statistical models used to understand how inter-kernel moisture content (MC) variability reduction in dried rice can improve head rice yield and end-use functionality. Microwave (MW) pre-drying for 180 seconds followed by gentle natural air drying resulted in low MC variability. The lower the MC variability, the better the head rice yield of the samples. Large rice fractions had the lowest MC variability and highest HRY when compared to medium and unfractionated rice. Abstract. Variability in moisture content between rice kernels due to the drying process within a harvest batch can result in irregularities in yields and the functional quality of the final product. Investigating strategies to achieve greater uniformity in inter-kernel moisture content within dried rice batches is a crucial avenue of research for the rice industry. The objectives of this study were to use a statistical modeling approach to (1) study the influence of moisture content (MC) variability on head rice yield (HRY) and pasting properties, and (2) describe if preheating rice kernels with microwaves (MW) of the 915 MHz frequency prior to natural air drying influences MC variability within single rice kernels. Natural air drying used a chamber with a 25°C air temperature and 56% relative humidity. MW heating was administered at a 3 kW power level for 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 s. Statistical models were developed to describe the interrelationships among treatments and MC variability, head rice yields, and functionality of the rice. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.9323) between the initial average MC of the rice bulk and the inter-kernel MC variability. The MW heating duration (p<0.0275) significantly impacted MC variability and HRY. MW treatments reduced MC variability within rice kernels and positively influenced rice’s milling yield and pasting properties. All treatments did not significantly impact the pasting properties of rice. This study demonstrates the feasibility of employing MW treatments in tandem with natural air drying to reduce inter-kernel MC variability within dried batches of rough rice. Keywords: Head rice yield, Microwave heating, Moisture content variability, Pasting properties, Single rice kernel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial average moisture content of the rice bulk was strongly correlated with inter-kernel MC variability (r = 0.9323).

Treatment
initial average MC of the rice bulke1
Outcome
inter-kernel MC variabilitye1
Direction
strong correlatione1
Value
r = 0.9323e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variability in moisture content between rice kernels due to the drying process within a harvest batch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong correlation (r = 0.9323) between the initial average MC of the rice bulk and the inter-kernel MC variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1666 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower moisture content variability was associated with higher head rice yield.

Treatment
MC variabilitye0
Outcome
head rice yielde0
Direction
the bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the MC variability, the better the head rice yield of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variability in moisture content between rice kernels due to the drying process within a harvest batch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large rice fractions had the lowest moisture content variability compared with medium and unfractionated rice.

Treatment
Large rice fractionse0
Outcome
MC variabilitye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
medium and unfractionated ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large rice fractions had the lowest MC variability and highest HRY when compared to medium and unfractionated rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large rice fractions had the highest head rice yield (HRY) compared with medium and unfractionated rice.

Treatment
Large rice fractionse0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
medium and unfractionated ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large rice fractions had the lowest MC variability and highest HRY when compared to medium and unfractionated rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MW treatments reduced moisture content variability within rice kernels.

Treatment
MW treatmentse0
Outcome
MC variabilitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MW treatments reduced MC variability within rice kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MW treatments positively influenced the milling yield of rice.

Treatment
MW treatmentse0
Outcome
milling yielde2
Direction
positively influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MW treatments reduced MC variability within rice kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1806 · show in text ↑
e1

“positively influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1832 · show in text ↑
e2

“milling yield and pasting properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments did not significantly affect the pasting properties of rice.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
pasting propertiese0
Direction
did not significantly impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments did not significantly impact the pasting properties of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MW heating duration significantly affected moisture content variability and head rice yield (p<0.0275).

Treatment
MW heating duratione1
Outcome
MC variability and HRYe1
Value
p<0.0275e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variability in moisture content between rice kernels due to the drying process within a harvest batch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“The MW heating duration (p<0.0275) significantly impacted MC variability and HRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave pre-drying for 180 seconds followed by natural air drying resulted in low moisture content variability.

Treatment
Microwave (MW) pre-drying for 180 seconds followed by gentle natural air dryinge1
Outcome
MC variabilitye1
Direction
lowe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variability in moisture content between rice kernels due to the drying process within a harvest batch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Microwave (MW) pre-drying for 180 seconds followed by gentle natural air drying resulted in low MC variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–289 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 31 positive, 24 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

physical treatment · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.