Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber

Wei Yang; Lan Wang; Xiao Li; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cucumber is one of the top ten vegetables globally and is widely cultivated worldwide. However, Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinum, is one of the most serious soil-borne diseases in cucumber cultivation, causing significant economic losses. Biological control has great potential in the prevention of cucumber wilt disease, but the mechanism involved still needs further research. In this study, biocontrol isolate Bacillus subtilis 1JN2, which was isolated in our previous work, was evaluated in field conditions against Fusarium wilt, and the rhizosphere fungal diversity was analyzed. The results indicated that the biocontrol efficacy of B. subtilis 1JN2 reached 58.5% compared with the blank control, and the population density of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere decreased from 495 copies/g of soil before inoculation to 20 copies/g 14 days after treatment. High-throughput sequencing demonstrated that after an inoculation of 1JN2, the populations that decreased significantly include the genera of Olpidium and Pseudallescheria, from more than 20% to less than 8%. And the most increased population belonged to the family Chaetomiaceae, from 6.82% to 18.77%, 12.39%, 44.41%, and 19.41% at the four sample time points after treatment. In addition, soil-related enzyme activities, including catalase, soil dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and polyphenol oxidase, were analyzed before and after treatment with 1JN2. The results indicated that all the enzyme activities showed an upward trend following inoculation. These findings demonstrate the potential of using B. subtilis 1JN2 as a biocontrol agent for controlling Fusarium wilt in cucumber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis 1JN2 had 58.5% biocontrol efficacy against cucumber Fusarium wilt compared with a blank control.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
B. subtilis 1JN2e0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogene0
Second interactor
B. subtilis 1JN2Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol efficacye0
Value
58.5%e0
Comparator
blank controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biocontrol efficacy of B. subtilis 1JN2 reached 58.5% compared with the blank control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere F. oxysporum population density fell from 495 to 20 copies/g of soil by 14 days after treatment.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
population density of F. oxysporum in the rhizospheree0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
20 copies/ge0
Qualifier
495 copies/g of soile0
Comparator
before inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the population density of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere decreased from 495 copies/g of soil before inoculation to 20 copies/g 14 days after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olpidium declined significantly from more than 20% to less than 8% after inoculation.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculation of 1JN2e0
Interactor
OlpidiumOlpidiume0other
Outcome
Olpidiume0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
less than 8%e0
Qualifier
more than 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Olpidium
Olpidium · Interactorcrseaquist · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after an inoculation of 1JN2, the populations that decreased significantly include the genera of Olpidium and Pseudallescheria, from more than 20% to less than 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudallescheria declined significantly from more than 20% to less than 8% after inoculation.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculation of 1JN2e0
Interactor
PseudallescheriaPseudallescheriae0other
Outcome
Pseudallescheriae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
less than 8%e0
Qualifier
more than 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after an inoculation of 1JN2, the populations that decreased significantly include the genera of Olpidium and Pseudallescheria, from more than 20% to less than 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chaetomiaceae rose from 6.82% to 18.77% at the first sampling point.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
treatmente0
Interactor
ChaetomiaceaeChaetomiaceaee0other
Outcome
Chaetomiaceaee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
18.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chaetomiaceae, from 6.82% to 18.77%, 12.39%, 44.41%, and 19.41% at the four sample time points after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chaetomiaceae rose from 6.82% to 12.39% at the second sampling point.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
treatmente0
Interactor
ChaetomiaceaeChaetomiaceaee0other
Outcome
Chaetomiaceaee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
12.39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chaetomiaceae, from 6.82% to 18.77%, 12.39%, 44.41%, and 19.41% at the four sample time points after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chaetomiaceae rose from 6.82% to 44.41% at the third sampling point.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
treatmente0
Interactor
ChaetomiaceaeChaetomiaceaee0other
Outcome
Chaetomiaceaee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
44.41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chaetomiaceae, from 6.82% to 18.77%, 12.39%, 44.41%, and 19.41% at the four sample time points after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chaetomiaceae rose from 6.82% to 19.41% at the fourth sampling point.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
treatmente0
Interactor
ChaetomiaceaeChaetomiaceaee0other
Outcome
Chaetomiaceaee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
19.41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chaetomiaceae, from 6.82% to 18.77%, 12.39%, 44.41%, and 19.41% at the four sample time points after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil catalase, dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase activities trended upward after inoculation.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
catalase, soil dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatasee0
Direction
upward trende0
Comparator
beforee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil-related enzyme activities, including catalase, soil dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and polyphenol oxidase, were analyzed before and after treatment with 1JN2. The results indicated that all the enzyme activities showed an upward trend following inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil polyphenol oxidase activity trended upward after inoculation.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
upward trende0
Comparator
beforee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyphenol oxidase, were analyzed before and after treatment with 1JN2. The results indicated that all the enzyme activities showed an upward trend following inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control Potential of Bacillus subtilis Isolate 1JN2 against Fusarium Wilt on Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · Fusarium · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.