Abstract
The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with seven treatments and three replications. Field experiment was carried out during the kharif season of 2018-19 at post graduate research farm, college of agriculture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra. Measurements were taken for growth parameters (plant height, leaf area plant-1, Number of sympodial branches and dry matter accumulation) and yield components (number of picked bolls per plant, weight of seed cotton per boll, yield of seed cotton and stalk ha-1) of deshi cotton. Results showed that plant height of cotton was influenced due to different intercrops at 60 DAS, except at 30 DAS. Intercrops viz., green gram, black gram, soybean and sesamum did not show any influence on plant height of cotton. However, pearl millet reduced plant height of cotton drastically and shown its dominance. Similar trend was observed in respect of leaf area plant-1 of cotton as regards to pearl millet. Dry matter accumulation in cotton was influenced during flowering stage only. Planting cotton with solid sole and sole skip row techniques resulted in better dry matter accumulation. Cotton grown as either sole or with intercrops recorded similar total number of picked bolls of cotton. Average weight of seed cotton per boll was higher in skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1). Sole skip row planting of cotton registered the highest seed cotton yield (1966.48 kg ha-1). Skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1) recorded highest stalk yield (2828.54 kg ha-1). It can be concluded that growth and yield parameters of deshi cotton drastically reduced when intercropped with pearl millet compared to other intercrops, and it is advisable to avoid intercropping hybrid pearl millet with cotton.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Intercrops influenced cotton plant height at 60 DAS but not at 30 DAS.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- different intercropse1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Qualifier
- at 60 DAS, except at 30 DASe1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e1“Results showed that plant height of cotton was influenced due to different intercrops at 60 DAS, except at 30 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram, black gram and soybean intercrops did not change cotton plant height.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume2
- Treatment
- green gram, black gram, soybeane2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e2“Intercrops viz., green gram, black gram, soybean and sesamum did not show any influence on plant height of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesamum intercrop did not change cotton plant height.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume2
- Treatment
- sesamume2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e2“Intercrops viz., green gram, black gram, soybean and sesamum did not show any influence on plant height of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet drastically reduced cotton plant height.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- pearl millete3
- Outcome
- plant heighte3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Qualifier
- drasticallye3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e3“However, pearl millet reduced plant height of cotton drastically and shown its dominance”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet reduced cotton leaf area per plant.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume4
- Treatment
- pearl millete4
- Outcome
- leaf area plant-1e4
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e4“Similar trend was observed in respect of leaf area plant-1 of cotton as regards to pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton dry matter accumulation was influenced only during the flowering stage.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume5
- Organ / stage
- flowering stagee5
- Outcome
- Dry matter accumulatione5
- Qualifier
- influenced during flowering stage onlye5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e5“Dry matter accumulation in cotton was influenced during flowering stage only”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole skip row planting gave better cotton dry matter accumulation than solid sole planting.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume6
- Treatment
- sole skip row techniquese6
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione6
- Direction
- bettere6
- Comparator
- solid solee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e6“Planting cotton with solid sole and sole skip row techniques resulted in better dry matter accumulation”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole and intercropped cotton recorded similar total numbers of picked bolls.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume7
- Treatment
- intercropse7
- Outcome
- total number of picked bollse7
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede7
- Comparator
- solee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e7“Cotton grown as either sole or with intercrops recorded similar total number of picked bolls of cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Average weight of seed cotton per boll was higher in skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1).
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume4
- Treatment
- skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1)e4
- Outcome
- weight of seed cotton per bolle4
- Direction
- highere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e4“Average weight of seed cotton per boll was higher in skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole skip row planting gave the highest cotton seed yield, 1966.48 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume5
- Treatment
- Sole skip row plantinge5
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 1966.48 kg ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e5“Sole skip row planting of cotton registered the highest seed cotton yield (1966.48 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1) gave the highest cotton stalk yield, 2828.54 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume6
- Treatment
- Skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1)e6
- Outcome
- stalk yielde6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Value
- 2828.54 kg ha-1e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e6“Skip row planting of cotton + sesamum (2:1) recorded highest stalk yield (2828.54 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping deshi cotton with pearl millet reduced growth and yield parameters more than other intercrops did.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e7“growth and yield parameters of deshi cotton drastically reduced when intercropped with pearl millet compared to other intercrops”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping hybrid pearl millet with cotton should be avoided.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Outcome
- avoid intercropping hybrid pearl millet with cottone1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Deshi Cotton Growth and Yield Response to Skip-row Planting in Combination with Intercrops”
e1“it is advisable to avoid intercropping hybrid pearl millet with cotton”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna radiata var. radiata · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Vigna mungo · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Glycine max · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.