Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Enhancing cauliflower growth under cadmium stress: synergistic effects of Cd-tolerant Klebsiella strains and jasmonic acid foliar application

Shumila Shahid; Abubakar Dar; Azhar Hussain; et al.

19
claims
55
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The pollution of heavy metals (HMs) is a major environmental concern for agricultural farming communities due to water scarcity, which forces farmers to use wastewater for irrigation purposes in Pakistan. Vegetables grown around the cities are irrigated with domestic and industrial wastewater from areas near mining, paint, and ceramic industries that pollute edible parts of crops with various HMs. Cadmium (Cd) is an extremely toxic metal in arable soil that enters the food chain and damages the native biota, ultimately causing a reduction in plant growth and development. However, the use of microbes and growth regulators enhances plant growth and development as well as HM immobilization into the cell wall and hinders their entry into the food chain. Thus, the integrated use of bacterial consortium along with exogenously applied jasmonic acid (JA) mitigates the adverse effect of metal stress, ultimately reducing the metal mobility into roots by soil. Therefore, the current study was conducted to check the impact of Cd-tolerant bacteria and JA on the growth, nutrient status, and uptake of Cd in the cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea ). Our results demonstrated that increasing concentrations of Cd negatively affect growth, physiological, and biochemical attributes, while the use of a bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved chlorophyll contents, stem fresh and dry biomass (19.7, 12.7, and 17.3%), root length and root fresh and dry weights (28.8, 15.2, and 23.0%), and curd fresh and dry weights and curd diameter (18.7, 12.6, and 15.1%). However, the maximum reduction in soil Cd, roots, and curd uptake was observed by 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively, under integrated treatment as compared to the control. Moreover, integrating bacterial consortium and JA improves superoxide dismutase (SOD) (16.79%), peroxidase dismutase (POD) (26.96%), peroxidase (POX) (26.13%), and catalase (CAT) (26.86%). The plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents were significantly increased in soil, roots, and curd up to 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively. Hence, a consortium of Klebsiella strains in combination with JA is a potential phytostabilizer and it reduces the uptake of Cd from soil to roots to alleviate the adverse impact on cauliflower’s growth and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing cadmium concentrations reduced cauliflower growth, physiological, and biochemical attributes.

Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
growth, physiological, and biochemical attributese0
Direction
negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing concentrations of Cd negatively affect growth, physiological, and biochemical attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved chlorophyll content by 19.7%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
19.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved chlorophyll contents, stem fresh and dry biomass (19.7, 12.7, and 17.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved stem fresh biomass by 12.7%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
stem freshe0
Direction
improvede1
Value
12.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem fresh and dry biomass (19.7, 12.7, and 17.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved stem dry biomass by 17.3%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
stem fresh and dry biomasse0
Direction
improvede1
Value
17.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem fresh and dry biomass (19.7, 12.7, and 17.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved root length by 28.8%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
improvede1
Value
28.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length and root fresh and dry weights (28.8, 15.2, and 23.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved root fresh weight by 15.2%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
root freshe0
Direction
improvede1
Value
15.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length and root fresh and dry weights (28.8, 15.2, and 23.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved root dry weight by 23.0%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
root fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
improvede1
Value
23.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length and root fresh and dry weights (28.8, 15.2, and 23.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved curd fresh weight by 18.7%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
curd freshe0
Direction
improvede1
Value
18.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd fresh and dry weights and curd diameter (18.7, 12.6, and 15.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved curd dry weight by 12.6%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
curd fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
improvede1
Value
12.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd fresh and dry weights and curd diameter (18.7, 12.6, and 15.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved curd diameter by 15.1%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 )e1
Outcome
curd diametere0
Direction
improvede1
Value
15.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“curd fresh and dry weights and curd diameter (18.7, 12.6, and 15.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated treatment reduced soil cadmium by 8% against control.

Treatment
integrated treatmente0
Outcome
soil Cde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
8e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in soil Cd, roots, and curd uptake was observed by 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively, under integrated treatment as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated treatment reduced root cadmium uptake by 11% against control.

Treatment
integrated treatmente0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
11e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in soil Cd, roots, and curd uptake was observed by 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively, under integrated treatment as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated treatment reduced curd cadmium uptake by 9.3% against control.

Treatment
integrated treatmente0
Outcome
curd uptakee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
9.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in soil Cd, roots, and curd uptake was observed by 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively, under integrated treatment as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved superoxide dismutase by 16.79%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium and JAe0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
improvese0
Value
16.79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrating bacterial consortium and JA improves superoxide dismutase (SOD) (16.79%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1857 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved peroxidase dismutase by 26.96%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium and JAe1
Outcome
peroxidase dismutase (POD)e0
Direction
improvese1
Value
26.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase dismutase (POD) (26.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“integrating bacterial consortium and JA improves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved peroxidase by 26.13%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium and JAe1
Outcome
peroxidase (POX)e0
Direction
improvese1
Value
26.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase (POX) (26.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“integrating bacterial consortium and JA improves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus JA improved catalase by 26.86%.

Treatment
bacterial consortium and JAe1
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
improvese1
Value
26.86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catalase (CAT) (26.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–1950 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“integrating bacterial consortium and JA improves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents increased significantly in soil, roots, and curd.

Outcome
plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8, 11, and 9.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents were significantly increased in soil, roots, and curd up to 8, 11, and 9.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose consortium plus JA as a phytostabilizer for cadmium stressed cauliflower.

Outcome
potential phytostabilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a consortium of Klebsiella strains in combination with JA is a potential phytostabilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2105–2193 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial consortium (SS7 + SS8) with JA (40 μmol L −1 ) significantly improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1378 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

jasmonic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

jasmonic acid · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

jasmonic acid · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.