Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Nutrient dynamics study and yield optimization for soybean through integrated nutrient and weed management

Meshenji Apon; Debika Nongmaithem; N. Anthony Baite; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soybean production faces many constraints with several factors, such as biotic and abiotic factors, and the crop management practices where inadequate nutrient management leads to a decline in production potential of the crop. Among the biotic factors, exploitation of resources by weeds not only causes a decline in production but also decreases the crop quality. Managing the weeds during the critical period of crop weed competition plays outstanding role in maximizing soybean production. In order to study the influence of integrated nutrient and weed management on nutrient dynamics and yield optimization of soybean an experiment was conducted in Split Plot Design with three nutrient management treatments in main plot {100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), 75% RDF + 25% N through farmyard manure (FYM) + Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and 50% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB} and five weed management treatments in the sub-plot (Hand weeding at 15, 30 and 45 DAS, Mechanical weeding at 20 and 40 DAS, Pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 PE fb Hand weeding at 30 DAS, Propaquizafop @ 0.075 kg a.i. ha−1 PoE fb Hand weeding at 45 DAS, and Weedy check as control). The results indicated that application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB recorded the highest seed yield, nutrient content in seed and uptake of N, P, K, and S in the seed and stover, microbial population, and soil nutrient status. Highest partial factor productivity was recorded under 50% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB. Under weed management, hand weeding recorded the highest growth, yield attributes and nutrient content, but was found to be at par with Pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 PE fb Hand weeding at 30 DAS and Propaquizafop @ 0.075 kg a.i. ha−1 PoE fb Hand weeding at 45 DAS. Application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB and pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb hand weeding at 30 DAS proves to be an effective strategy for soybean cultivation. The experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Medziphema, India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF, FYM and PSB treatment gave highest seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSBe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB recorded the highest seed yield, nutrient content in seed and uptake of N, P, K, and S in the seed and stover, microbial population, and soil nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave highest seed nutrient content and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSBe0
Outcome
nutrient content in seed and uptake of N, P, K, and S in the seed and stovere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB recorded the highest seed yield, nutrient content in seed and uptake of N, P, K, and S in the seed and stover, microbial population, and soil nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave highest microbial population and soil nutrient status.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSBe0
Outcome
microbial population, and soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB recorded the highest seed yield, nutrient content in seed and uptake of N, P, K, and S in the seed and stover, microbial population, and soil nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDF plus Rhizobium and PSB treatment had highest partial factor productivity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
50% RDF + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Outcome
partial factor productivitye0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest partial factor productivity was recorded under 50% RDF + Rhizobium + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave highest growth, yield attributes and nutrient content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and nutrient contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding recorded the highest growth, yield attributes and nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the combined 75% RDF and pendimethalin strategy for soybean cultivation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
effective strategy for soybean cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM + PSB and pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha−1 fb hand weeding at 30 DAS proves to be an effective strategy for soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1920 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 83 positive, 9 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

phosphorus · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 107 positive, 17 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

179 papers: 170 positive, 9 negative or no effect

169 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

310 papers: 265 positive, 45 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

306 papers more in this group

See all 310 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

355 papers: 303 positive, 52 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

351 papers more in this group

See all 355 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.