Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Research Journal

Enhancing vegetable cowpea growth and yield in semi-arid regions: Effect of liquid microbial consortia and variable nitrogen doses under saline and canal water irrigation

B K Yadav; Naveen Garg; Gulab Pandove; et al.

16
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 2-year experiment was undertaken to assess the impact of irrigation water quality, nitrogen doses, and microbial inoculants on soil nutrient availability, plant growth parameters, and green pod yield of cowpea in the semi-arid region of Punjab, India. Irrespective of other factors, nitrogen levels significantly influenced available N, P, and Fe in both years and across years when pooled, while Mn content was notably affected only when data were combined across years. Elevated soil pH, EC, K, and micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn) were observed in saline water irrigated plots in both years and across pooled data, whereas available N and P were high in canal water irrigated plots. Microbial inoculants reduced soil pH and EC while enhancing soil nutrient availability. Canal water irrigation, regardless of other variables, increased plant height by 13.9%, 16.4%, and 15.1%, pods per plant by 6.0%, 5.9%, and 2.7%, pod length by 6.1%, 4.3%, and 5.2%, and green pod yield by 114.4%, 118.0%, and 116.3% in 2019, 2020, and pooled years. Decreasing nitrogen levels also reduced pods per plant by 6.9%, 6.8%, and 6.7%, pod length by 10.6%, 11.8%, and 11.2%, and green pod yield by 8.6%, 7.2%, and 7.8% in 2019, 2020, and pooled years, regardless of other factors. Likewise, liquid bio-fertilizers, either alone or in combination, significantly affected pods per plant by 16.6%, 18.6%, and 17.5%, pod length by 26.4%, 28.1%, and 27.3%, and green pod yield by 12%, 32.82%, and 14.2% in 2019, 2020, and pooled years, irrespective of other factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly affected soil N, P and Fe availability.

Treatment
nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
available N, P, and Fee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen levels significantly influenced available N, P, and Fe in both years and across years when pooled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels affected soil Mn only in pooled years.

Treatment
nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
Mn contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn content was notably affected only when data were combined across years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrespective of other factors, nitrogen levels significantly influenced available N, P, and Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation raised soil pH, EC, K and micronutrients.

Treatment
saline water irrigated plotse0
Outcome
soil pH, EC, Ke0
Direction
Elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated soil pH, EC, K, and micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn) were observed in saline water irrigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canal water irrigation raised available soil N and P.

Treatment
canal water irrigated plotse0
Outcome
available N and Pe0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available N and P were high in canal water irrigated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants reduced soil pH and EC.

Treatment
Microbial inoculantse0
Outcome
soil pH and ECe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculants reduced soil pH and EC while enhancing soil nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants enhanced soil nutrient availability.

Treatment
Microbial inoculantse0
Outcome
soil nutrient availabilitye0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculants reduced soil pH and EC while enhancing soil nutrient availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canal irrigation increased plant height across years.

Treatment
Canal water irrigatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.9%, 16.4%, and 15.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canal water irrigation, regardless of other variables, increased plant height by 13.9%, 16.4%, and 15.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canal irrigation increased pods per plant across years.

Treatment
Canal water irrigatione1
Outcome
pods per plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
6.0%, 5.9%, and 2.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pods per plant by 6.0%, 5.9%, and 2.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canal water irrigation, regardless of other variables, increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canal irrigation increased pod length across years.

Treatment
Canal water irrigatione1
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
6.1%, 4.3%, and 5.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod length by 6.1%, 4.3%, and 5.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canal water irrigation, regardless of other variables, increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canal irrigation increased green pod yield across years.

Treatment
Canal water irrigatione1
Outcome
green pod yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
114.4%, 118.0%, and 116.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green pod yield by 114.4%, 118.0%, and 116.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canal water irrigation, regardless of other variables, increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced pods per plant across years.

Treatment
Decreasing nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
pods per plante0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.9%, 6.8%, and 6.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing nitrogen levels also reduced pods per plant by 6.9%, 6.8%, and 6.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced pod length across years.

Treatment
Decreasing nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
10.6%, 11.8%, and 11.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod length by 10.6%, 11.8%, and 11.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing nitrogen levels also reduced pods per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced green pod yield across years.

Treatment
Decreasing nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
green pod yielde0
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
8.6%, 7.2%, and 7.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green pod yield by 8.6%, 7.2%, and 7.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decreasing nitrogen levels also reduced pods per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid biofertilizers significantly affected pods per plant across years.

Treatment
liquid bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
pods per plante0
Value
16.6%, 18.6%, and 17.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liquid bio-fertilizers, either alone or in combination, significantly affected pods per plant by 16.6%, 18.6%, and 17.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid biofertilizers significantly affected pod length across years.

Treatment
liquid bio-fertilizerse1
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Value
26.4%, 28.1%, and 27.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod length by 26.4%, 28.1%, and 27.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“liquid bio-fertilizers, either alone or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid biofertilizers significantly affected green pod yield across years.

Treatment
liquid bio-fertilizerse1
Outcome
green pod yielde0
Value
12%, 32.82%, and 14.2%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green pod yield by 12%, 32.82%, and 14.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“liquid bio-fertilizers, either alone or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1333 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

68 papers: 62 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

irrigation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.