Paper · 2024 · Applied Food Research

Improvement of quality and shelf-life of tomatoes with Aloe vera coatings enriched with tulsi extract

Joya Roy; Md. Nahidul Islam; Sabina Yasmin; et al.

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This work aimed to investigate the effect of edible coatings on shelf life and quality of tomato fruits. Aloe vera (AL) gel and tulsi leaf extract (TE), and a combination of aloe vera gel and tulsi extract (ALTE) coating, were applied to the surface of fresh tomatoes and stored at ∼26 °C and 75–82 % relative humidity for 25 days. Tomato fruits were evaluated periodically after the application of coating materials. Results showed that tomatoes coated with AL and TE maintained better quality than uncoated tomato fruits. Among various treatments, tomatoes coated with AL resulted in delayed weight loss (3.25 %), and ripening process, reduced disease incidence, and disease severity. It also showed that AL coated fruits had lower amount of lycopene (28.6 μg/g) and β carotene (11.42 μg/g), and a higher amount of phenolics (84.56 mg/100 gm) content. Disease incidence was significantly reduced by the coatings, with ALTE showing the lowest incidence (31 % at 25 days) compared to 100 % in the control. This novel edible coating technology can be applied industrially to enhance the quality and shelf life of mature tomato fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coating maintained better tomato quality than no coating.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
uncoated tomato fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that tomatoes coated with AL and TE maintained better quality than uncoated tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TE coating maintained better tomato quality than no coating.

Treatment
TEe0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
uncoated tomato fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that tomatoes coated with AL and TE maintained better quality than uncoated tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coating delayed tomato weight loss.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3.25 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among various treatments, tomatoes coated with AL resulted in delayed weight loss (3.25 %), and ripening process, reduced disease incidence, and disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coating delayed tomato ripening process.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
ripening processe0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among various treatments, tomatoes coated with AL resulted in delayed weight loss (3.25 %), and ripening process, reduced disease incidence, and disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coating reduced tomato disease incidence.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among various treatments, tomatoes coated with AL resulted in delayed weight loss (3.25 %), and ripening process, reduced disease incidence, and disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coating reduced tomato disease severity.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among various treatments, tomatoes coated with AL resulted in delayed weight loss (3.25 %), and ripening process, reduced disease incidence, and disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coated tomato fruit had lower lycopene content.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
28.6 μg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also showed that AL coated fruits had lower amount of lycopene (28.6 μg/g) and β carotene (11.42 μg/g), and a higher amount of phenolics (84.56 mg/100 gm) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coated tomato fruit had lower β carotene content.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
β carotenee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
11.42 μg/ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also showed that AL coated fruits had lower amount of lycopene (28.6 μg/g) and β carotene (11.42 μg/g), and a higher amount of phenolics (84.56 mg/100 gm) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL coated tomato fruit had higher phenolics content.

Treatment
ALe0
Outcome
phenolicse0
Direction
highere0
Value
84.56 mg/100 gme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also showed that AL coated fruits had lower amount of lycopene (28.6 μg/g) and β carotene (11.42 μg/g), and a higher amount of phenolics (84.56 mg/100 gm) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ALTE coating had the lowest disease incidence at day 25, 31% versus 100% in control.

Treatment
ALTEe0
Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
31 %e0
Qualifier
100 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence was significantly reduced by the coatings, with ALTE showing the lowest incidence (31 % at 25 days) compared to 100 % in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose industrial application of coatings to extend tomato quality and shelf life.

Outcome
enhance the quality and shelf life of mature tomato fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This novel edible coating technology can be applied industrially to enhance the quality and shelf life of mature tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1133 · show in text ↑

Aloe vera · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Aloe vera · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Aloe vera · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Aloe vera · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 146 positive, 14 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.