Abstract
The experiment was carried out during Kharif season of 2021 at Farm unit 5, Integral Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Integral University, Lucknow, U.P. (India) to evaluate the effect of tillage and nutrient management strategies on maize productivity. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with 2 tillage options i.e., Conventional tillage (CT) and Raised beds planting (RBP) as main plots and 5 nutrient management practices, viz. FP (Farmer practice), ST (State recommendation), STBR (soil test-based recommendation), NE (Nutrient expertTM) 6t/ha and NE 7 t/ha were assigned in sub-plots with 3 replications. The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT. Similarly, significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT. The yield attributes, yield parameters nutrient uptake and economics in maize were significantly influenced by nutrient management techniques. The maximum yield attributes, viz. cob girth, grain row/cob, grain/row, no. of grain/cob, grain weight/cob and yield were recorded under NE @7 t/ha. Similarly, total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted NE @7 t/ha than remaining other treatment. Overall, results revealed that growing maize on permanent raised bed along with NE @ 7 t/ha is a promising option for sustaining the productivity of maize intensively grown in Upper Gangetic Plains of India.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased maize cob girth to 16.8 cm relative to conventional tillage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased grain rows per cob to 16.2.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased grains per row to 40.6.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased grains per cob to 700.1.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased grain weight per cob to 162.7 g.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The RBP recorded significantly higher yield attributes, viz. cob girth (16.8 cm), grain row/cob (16.2), grain/row (40.6), no. of grain/cob (700.1), grain weight/cob (162.7 g) over CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds produced significantly higher grain yield of 7.22 t/ha than conventional tillage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds produced significantly higher stover yield of 11.01 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds produced significantly higher cob yield of 9.72 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds produced significantly higher biological yield of 20.70 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased total N, P and K uptake over conventional tillage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds significantly increased gross and net returns and benefit to cost ratio.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain (7.22 t/ha), stover (11.01 t/ha), cob (9.72 t/ha), biological yield (20.70 t/ha), total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted in RBP than CT.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management methods significantly affected maize yield traits, nutrient uptake, and economics.
- Treatment
- nutrient management techniquese0
- Outcome
- yield attributes, yield parameters nutrient uptake and economicse0
Zea maysNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield attributes, yield parameters nutrient uptake and economics in maize were significantly influenced by nutrient management techniques.”
Claim · model-written summary
NE at 7 t/ha gave maximum cob girth, grain rows per cob, grains per row and cob, grain weight per cob, and yield.
- Treatment
- NE @7 t/hae0
- Outcome
- cob girth, grain row/cob, grain/row, no. of grain/cob, grain weight/cob and yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield attributes, viz. cob girth, grain row/cob, grain/row, no. of grain/cob, grain weight/cob and yield were recorded under NE @7 t/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
NE at 7 t/ha increased N, P and K uptake, gross and net returns, and benefit to cost ratio relative to other treatments.
- Treatment
- NE @7 t/hae0
- Outcome
- total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratioe0
- Comparator
- remaining other treatmente0
Not reportedTaxonDirection
Verbatim
e0“total uptake of N, P and K, gross return, net return and B: C ratio was noted NE @7 t/ha than remaining other treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend permanent raised beds with NE at 7 t/ha for sustaining maize productivity in the Upper Gangetic Plains.
- Treatment
- permanent raised bed along with NE @ 7 t/hae0
- Outcome
- sustaining the productivity of maizee0
- Setting
- Upper Gangetic Plains of Indiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growing maize on permanent raised bed along with NE @ 7 t/ha is a promising option for sustaining the productivity of maize intensively grown in Upper Gangetic Plains of India.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.