Paper · 2024 · The ISME Journal

Agricultural intensification reduces selection of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in wheat

Tessa E Reid; Vanessa N Kavamura; Adriana Torres-Ballesteros; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The complex evolutionary history of wheat has shaped its associated root microbial community. However, consideration of impacts from agricultural intensification has been limited. This study investigated how endogenous (genome polyploidization) and exogenous (introduction of chemical fertilizers) factors have shaped beneficial rhizobacterial selection. We combined culture-independent and -dependent methods to analyze rhizobacterial community composition and its associated functions at the root-soil interface from a range of ancestral and modern wheat genotypes, grown with and without the addition of chemical fertilizer. In controlled pot experiments, fertilization and soil compartment (rhizosphere, rhizoplane) were the dominant factors shaping rhizobacterial community composition, whereas the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation. Rhizoplane-derived culturable bacterial collections tested for plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits revealed that fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats but not in wild wheat progenitors. Taxonomic classification of these isolates showed that these differences were largely driven by reduced selection of beneficial root bacteria representative of the Bacteroidota phylum in allopolyploid wheats. Furthermore, the complexity of supported beneficial bacterial populations in hexaploid wheats was greatly reduced in comparison to diploid wild wheats. We therefore propose that the selection of root-associated bacterial genera with PGP functions may be impaired by crop domestication in a fertilizer-dependent manner, a potentially crucial finding to direct future plant breeding programs to improve crop production systems in a changing environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization and soil compartment were the dominant factors in root bacterial composition.

Organ / stage
rhizosphere, rhizoplanee0e1e2
Treatment
fertilizatione0e1e2
Outcome
rhizobacterial community compositione0e1e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization and soil compartment (rhizosphere, rhizoplane) were the dominant factors shaping rhizobacterial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–790 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genome expansion from diploid to allopolyploid explained the next greatest bacterial community variation.

Material
diploid to allopolyploide0e1e2
Outcome
variatione0e1e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduced putative beneficial rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0e1e2
Material
allopolyploid wheatse0e1e2
Treatment
fertilizatione0e1e2
Outcome
abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriae0e1e2
Direction
reducede0e1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not reduce putative beneficial rhizobacteria in wild wheat progenitors.

Material
wild wheat progenitorse0e1e2
Treatment
fertilizatione0e1e2
Outcome
putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriae0e1e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not in wild wheat progenitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced selection of Bacteroidota representatives largely drove the differences.

Interactor
BacteroidotaBacteroidotae0e1e2
Outcome
selection of beneficial root bacteria representative of the Bacteroidota phylume0e1e2
Direction
reducede0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences were largely driven by reduced selection of beneficial root bacteria representative of the Bacteroidota phylum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexaploid wheat supported much less complex beneficial bacterial populations than wild diploid wheat.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0e1e2
Material
hexaploid wheatse0e1e2
Outcome
complexity of supported beneficial bacterial populationse0e1e2
Direction
greatly reducede0e1e2
Comparator
diploid wild wheatse0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“complexity of supported beneficial bacterial populations in hexaploid wheats was greatly reduced in comparison to diploid wild wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1516 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose that domestication impairs selection of beneficial root bacteria conditional on fertilizer.

Outcome
selection of root-associated bacterial genera with PGP functionse0e1e2
Qualifier
in a fertilizer-dependent mannere0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selection of root-associated bacterial genera with PGP functions may be impaired by crop domestication in a fertilizer-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1683 · show in text ↑
e1

“the expansion of the wheat genome from diploid to allopolyploid caused the next greatest variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–898 · show in text ↑
e2

“fertilization reduced the abundance of putative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in allopolyploid wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1121 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Triticum (wheats)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.