Paper · 2024 · Ciência Rural

Mortality of Tuta absoluta by sprayers deposit volume structure

Gefferson Pereira da Paixão; Marconi Ribeiro Furtado Júnior; Paulo Antônio Santana Júnior; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In the scientific toxicity evaluations of insecticides against larvae of Tuta absoluta (Tomato pinworm), a leaf coverage rate of 100 % or very close to this value is sought to guarantee the contact of the insect with the chemical product. However, deposition can change according to the different pesticide application methods used in field productions; consequently, interfering with pest control. From this perspective, this study evaluated the mortality of Tuta absoluta and the deposited volume dispersion on tomato leaflets as a function of droplet sizes and the method of chemical treatment with abamectin. For that purpose, an experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with five treatments and five replications. The treatments consisted of different chemical treatment methods: immersion, hydraulic spraying with three droplet sizes, and pneumatic spraying, in which the following parameters were evaluated: larval mortality, volume retained (deposition), surface density of active ingredient, droplet density, and coverage percentage. The different chemical treatments with abamectin provided larval mortality rates above 90%. Furthermore, the highest mortality values (98% and 95.9%) were associated; respectively, with the sprayings that provided the highest droplet densities: hydraulic spraying with average droplets (181 droplets cm-2) and pneumatic spraying with very fine droplets (256 droplets cm-2), the latter using an application volume 84% lower (80 L ha-1) than the lowest volume recommended by the manufacturer (500 L ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abamectin treatments gave Tuta absoluta larval mortality above 90%.

Treatment
chemical treatments with abamectine0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
larval mortality ratese0
Direction
abovee0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The different chemical treatments with abamectin provided larval mortality rates above 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“mortality of Tuta absoluta and the deposited volume dispersion on tomato leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydraulic spraying with average droplets gave 98% Tuta absoluta mortality.

Treatment
hydraulic spraying with average dropletse0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
mortality of Tuta absolutae1
Direction
higheste0
Value
98%e0
Qualifier
181 droplets cm-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest mortality values (98% and 95.9%) were associated; respectively, with the sprayings that provided the highest droplet densities: hydraulic spraying with average droplets (181 droplets cm-2) and pneumatic spraying with very fine droplets (256 droplets cm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1438 · show in text ↑
e1

“mortality of Tuta absoluta and the deposited volume dispersion on tomato leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pneumatic spraying with very fine droplets gave 95.9% Tuta absoluta mortality.

Treatment
pneumatic spraying with very fine dropletse0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
mortality of Tuta absolutae1
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.9%e0
Qualifier
256 droplets cm-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest mortality values (98% and 95.9%) were associated; respectively, with the sprayings that provided the highest droplet densities: hydraulic spraying with average droplets (181 droplets cm-2) and pneumatic spraying with very fine droplets (256 droplets cm-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1438 · show in text ↑
e1

“mortality of Tuta absoluta and the deposited volume dispersion on tomato leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–538 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pneumatic spraying used 80 L ha-1, 84% less application volume than the manufacturer minimum.

Treatment
pneumatic spraying with very fine dropletse1
Outcome
application volumee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
80 L ha-1e0
Qualifier
84%e0
Comparator
lowest volume recommended by the manufacturere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the latter using an application volume 84% lower (80 L ha-1) than the lowest volume recommended by the manufacturer (500 L ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1568 · show in text ↑
e1

“pneumatic spraying with very fine droplets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1418 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–538 · show in text ↑

abamectin · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.