Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.). The trial was laid down in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications and twelve treatments viz, T1 100% RDF, T2 100% RDF + Azotobacter, T3 100% RDF + Azotobacter + PSB, T4 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM, T5 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter, T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB, T7 50% RDF + 50% N from FYM, T8 50% RDF + 50% N from FYM + Azotobacter, T9 50% RDF + 50% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB, T10 25% RDF + 75% N from FYM, T11 25% RDF + 75% N from FYM + Azotobacter, T12 25% RDF + 75% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB. Result of this study revealed that there was significant effect on growth and yield parameters. Plant height, number of branches, number of siliques, length of silique, number of seed per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield in T6 which was statistically at par with T9, T8, T7, T3. Maximum yield (1807 kg/ha) was recorded in T6. It may be concluded that RDF with organic Manure (FYM) and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB) is possible to produce more yield in mustard crops cultivated without much soil productivity under Indo-Gangetic plains of central Uttar Pradesh.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of mustard in a field experiment in Jaunpur district.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea L.
Brassica junceae1 - Treatment
- integrated nutrient managemente1
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse2
- Setting
- Jaunpur districte1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e2“there was significant effect on growth and yield parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, T6 (75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB) had plant height, number of branches and number of siliques statistically at par with T9, T8, T7 and T3.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae1
- Treatment
- T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSBe6
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere6symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe6symbiont
- Outcome
- Plant height, number of branches, number of siliquese5
- Direction
- statistically at pare5
- Comparator
- T9, T8, T7, T3e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e5“Plant height, number of branches, number of siliques, length of silique, number of seed per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield in T6 which was statistically at par with T9, T8, T7, T3”
e6“T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, T6 had length of silique, number of seeds per siliqua and test weight statistically at par with T9, T8, T7 and T3.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae1
- Treatment
- T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSBe6
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere6symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe6symbiont
- Outcome
- length of silique, number of seed per siliqua, test weighte5
- Direction
- statistically at pare5
- Comparator
- T9, T8, T7, T3e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e5“Plant height, number of branches, number of siliques, length of silique, number of seed per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield in T6 which was statistically at par with T9, T8, T7, T3”
e6“T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB”
Claim · model-written summary
In mustard, T6 had seed and stover yield statistically at par with T9, T8, T7 and T3.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae1
- Treatment
- T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSBe6
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere6symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe6symbiont
- Outcome
- seed and stover yielde5
- Direction
- statistically at pare5
- Comparator
- T9, T8, T7, T3e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e5“Plant height, number of branches, number of siliques, length of silique, number of seed per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield in T6 which was statistically at par with T9, T8, T7, T3”
e6“T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave the maximum yield of 1807 kg/ha in mustard.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea L.Brassica junceae1
- Treatment
- T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSBe6
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere6symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe6symbiont
- Outcome
- Maximum yielde3
- Direction
- Maximume3
- Value
- 1807 kg/hae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi session of 2020-21 in Jaunpur district which lies Indo-Gangetic plains of Central Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management in mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e3“Maximum yield (1807 kg/ha) was recorded in T6”
e6“T6 75% RDF + 25% N from FYM + Azotobacter + PSB”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF combined with FYM and biofertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB) is considered possible to produce more mustard yield under Indo-Gangetic plains conditions.
- Taxon
- mustard cropse4
- Treatment
- RDF with organic Manure (FYM) and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB)e4
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere4symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe4symbiont
- Outcome
- more yielde4
- Setting
- Indo-Gangetic plains of central Uttar Pradeshe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“It may be concluded that RDF with organic Manure (FYM) and Biofertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB) is possible to produce more yield in mustard crops cultivated without much soil productivity under Indo-Gangetic plains of central Uttar Pradesh”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
135 papers more in this group
See all 139 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.