Abstract
A study was carried out at the College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, during the Rabi Season of 2022-2023.The field experiment was divided into 13 quadrates with a 1.5 X 0.5 m spacing between each of the 100 m² protected and unprotected plots. While the unprotected plots were left to natural infestation during the crop growth period, the protected plots were regularly treated with pesticides to prevent insect infestation. Significant variations in plant height, head diameter, cabbage head weight, and head damage loss were found between the two treatments when compared. The mean reductions in the unprotected plots were 20.2 cm, 10.59 cm, 0.88 kg, and 40%, whereas the protected plots showed mean reductions of 23.2 cm, 12.54 cm, 1.25 kg, and 11.69%, respectively. These variations led to quantitative losses estimates for plant height, head diameter, weight of cabbage heads, and head damage loss of 12.92%, 15.46%, 30.18%, and 64.1%, respectively. This indicates the effectiveness of chemical intervention in reducing yield losses in field-grown cabbage cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Protected plots had 12.92% less loss of plant height than unprotected plots.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatat0 - Treatment
- regularly treated with pesticidese1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Value
- 12.92%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These variations led to quantitative losses estimates for plant height, head diameter, weight of cabbage heads, and head damage loss of 12.92%, 15.46%, 30.18%, and 64.1%, respectively”
e1“protected plots were regularly treated with pesticides to prevent insect infestation”
t0“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”
Claim · model-written summary
Protected and unprotected plots differed in head diameter by 15.46% estimated loss.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- regularly treated with pesticidese1
- Outcome
- head diametere0
- Value
- 15.46%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These variations led to quantitative losses estimates for plant height, head diameter, weight of cabbage heads, and head damage loss of 12.92%, 15.46%, 30.18%, and 64.1%, respectively”
e1“protected plots were regularly treated with pesticides to prevent insect infestation”
t0“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”
Claim · model-written summary
Protected and unprotected plots differed in cabbage head weight by 30.18% estimated loss.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- regularly treated with pesticidese1
- Outcome
- weight of cabbage headse0
- Value
- 30.18%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These variations led to quantitative losses estimates for plant height, head diameter, weight of cabbage heads, and head damage loss of 12.92%, 15.46%, 30.18%, and 64.1%, respectively”
e1“protected plots were regularly treated with pesticides to prevent insect infestation”
t0“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”
Claim · model-written summary
Protected and unprotected plots differed in head damage loss by 64.1%.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- regularly treated with pesticidese1
- Outcome
- head damage losse0
- Value
- 64.1%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These variations led to quantitative losses estimates for plant height, head diameter, weight of cabbage heads, and head damage loss of 12.92%, 15.46%, 30.18%, and 64.1%, respectively”
e1“protected plots were regularly treated with pesticides to prevent insect infestation”
t0“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
insecticide · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
insecticide · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →insecticide · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.