Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Population Dynamics of the Diamondback Moth and Control of Lepidopteran Insects on Cabbage in the Rainy Season

V. C. Umeh; D. Onukwu; J. A. Adegoke; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cabbage production is seldom undertaken in southern Nigeria due to difficult climatic conditions and stress from pests and diseases. To increase producer confidence in cabbage production, appropriate insecticides to minimize insect pest damage and increase yield were tested. The trials were carried out during the 2004 and 2006 rainy seasons. The synthetic insecticides chlorpyrifos (Termex®), cypermethrin+acetamiprid (Conquest®), and the natural insecticide neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed oil extract were used. The insecticides significantly reduced the populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., and the cabbage head caterpillar, Crocidolomia binotalis Zeller. There was an increase in male adult diamondback moth populations during cabbage head formation and a decrease after harvest. Thereafter, a slight population increase was observed in the regrowth. The percentage of plants with unmarketable heads was lower for plots treated with chlorpyrifos in 2004 than in the control only. In 2006, the treated plots had significantly lower percentages of plants with damaged heads. Plots treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin+acetamiprid, or neem seed oil extract had higher yields than the untreated plots, although these were not significantly different.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides significantly reduced diamondback moth populations on cabbage.

Treatment
insecticidese0
Interactor
Plutella xylostella L.e0pest
Outcome
populations of diamondback mothe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticides significantly reduced the populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., and the cabbage head caterpillar, Crocidolomia binotalis Zeller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticides significantly reduced cabbage head caterpillar populations.

Treatment
insecticidese0
Interactor
Crocidolomia binotalis Zellere0pest
Outcome
cabbage head caterpillare0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The insecticides significantly reduced the populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L., and the cabbage head caterpillar, Crocidolomia binotalis Zeller.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Male adult diamondback moth populations rose during cabbage head formation.

Organ / stage
cabbage head formatione0
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae0pest
Outcome
male adult diamondback moth populationse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in male adult diamondback moth populations during cabbage head formation and a decrease after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Male adult diamondback moth populations fell after cabbage harvest.

Organ / stage
after harveste0
Interactor
diamondback mothPlutella xylostellae0pest
Outcome
male adult diamondback moth populationse0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostella · InteractorPlease report references to olei@despammed.com . · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in male adult diamondback moth populations during cabbage head formation and a decrease after harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diamondback moth populations increased slightly during cabbage regrowth.

Organ / stage
regrowthe0
Outcome
population increasee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thereafter, a slight population increase was observed in the regrowth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos reduced the share of cabbage plants with unmarketable heads in 2004.

Treatment
chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
percentage of plants with unmarketable headse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2004e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of plants with unmarketable heads was lower for plots treated with chlorpyrifos in 2004 than in the control only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cabbage plots had significantly fewer damaged heads in 2006.

Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
percentages of plants with damaged headse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2006, the treated plots had significantly lower percentages of plants with damaged heads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos increased cabbage yield without a significant difference.

Treatment
chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin+acetamiprid, or neem seed oil extract had higher yields than the untreated plots, although these were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin plus acetamiprid increased cabbage yield without a significant difference.

Treatment
cypermethrin+acetamipride0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin+acetamiprid, or neem seed oil extract had higher yields than the untreated plots, although these were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem seed oil extract increased cabbage yield without a significant difference.

Treatment
neem seed oil extracte0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin+acetamiprid, or neem seed oil extract had higher yields than the untreated plots, although these were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–90 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azadirachta indica · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

insecticide · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

botanical · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 59 positive, 1 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.