Paper · 2024 · Journal of Food Legumes

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of green gram [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek].

Suddala Prem Kumar; Nivedita Singh; Awadhesh Kishore; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The impact of integrated nutrient management was studied on growth and production, in green gram (Vigna radiata L.). Ten nutrient management treatments including fertilizer levels with or without inorganic fertilizers, Rhizobium, PSB and FYM were used in the present study. The plant height, dry weight per plant, leaf area index, no. of root nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were significantly increased with the use of fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM application. It also improved yield (grain yield by 164% and straw yield by 121%), and yield attributing factors. The addition of FYM, together with Rhizobium and PSB, assisted in boosting output in comparison to the control. However, 100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1) significantly improved the gross return (154%), net returns (551%), and benefit-cost ratio (137%). Therefore, higher yield of green gram can be achieved with integrated use of various nutrient sources were achieved usingsuch as inorganic fertilizers (RDF), bio-fertilizers, and FYM).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM increased plant height, dry weight and leaf area index.

Treatment
fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM applicatione0
Outcome
plant height, dry weight per plant, leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, dry weight per plant, leaf area index, no. of root nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were significantly increased with the use of fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient applications increased root nodules and pods per plant.

Treatment
fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM applicatione0
Outcome
no. of root nodules per plant and number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height, dry weight per plant, leaf area index, no. of root nodules per plant and number of pods per plant were significantly increased with the use of fertilizers, biofertilizers and FYM application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased grain yield by 164%.

Treatment
integrated nutrient managementt0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
164%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also improved yield (grain yield by 164% and straw yield by 121%), and yield attributing factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased straw yield by 121%.

Treatment
integrated nutrient managementt0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
121%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also improved yield (grain yield by 164% and straw yield by 121%), and yield attributing factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with Rhizobium and PSB boosted output relative to control.

Treatment
FYM, together with Rhizobium and PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
outpute0
Direction
boostinge0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of FYM, together with Rhizobium and PSB, assisted in boosting output in comparison to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment improved gross return by 154%.

Treatment
100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
154%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1) significantly improved the gross return (154%), net returns (551%), and benefit-cost ratio (137%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment improved net returns by 551%.

Treatment
100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
551%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1) significantly improved the gross return (154%), net returns (551%), and benefit-cost ratio (137%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined nutrient treatment improved benefit-cost ratio by 137%.

Treatment
100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
137%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, 100% RDF + PSB + Rhizobium + FYM (2.5 t ha-1) significantly improved the gross return (154%), net returns (551%), and benefit-cost ratio (137%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.