Paper · 2024 · Plants

Aeration Alleviated the Adverse Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing Reduction on Tomato Root Vigor, Photosynthetic Performance, and Fruit Development

Jingang Li; Pingru He; Qiu Jin; et al.

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To explore the compensation effect of aeration on tomato vegetative and reproductive growth in arid and semi-arid areas, a two-year field experiment was conducted with four micro-nano aeration ratios (0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%) and three nitrogen topdressing levels (80, 60, and 40 kg·ha−1) during the tomato growth period in Ningxia, China. The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality. Interestingly, since the aeration ratio exceeded 10%, the increase in the aeration ratio showed no significant effects on the single-fruit weight, tomato yield, and fruit quality. Moreover, with aerated underground drip irrigation, properly reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25% was favorable for enhancing tomato root vigor (5–31%), increasing tomato yield (0.5–9%), and improving fruit soluble solid accumulation (2–5%) and soluble sugar formation (4–9%). Importantly, increasing the aeration ratio by 5% could compensate for the adverse effects of reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25% by improving the leaf photosynthetic rate, promoting plant dry matter accumulation, increasing tomato yield, and enhancing the soluble solid and soluble sugar accumulation in tomato fruits. Synthetically considering the decrease in the nitrogen topdressing amount, leading to plant growth promotion, a tomato yield increase, and fruit quality improvement, a favorable nitrogen topdressing level of 60 kg·ha−1 and the corresponding proper aeration ratio of 10% were suggested for tomato underground drip irrigation in the Yinbei Irrigation District of Ningxia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration from 0 to 15% improved tomato root vigor by 3–104%.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
tomato root vigore0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
3–104%e0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration from 0 to 15% improved leaf net photosynthetic rate by 14–63%.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
leaf net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
14–63%e0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration from 0 to 15% improved plant dry matter accumulation by 3–59%.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
plant dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
facilitatione0
Value
3–59%e0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration from 0 to 15% improved plant nitrogen accumulation by 2–70%.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
plant nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
facilitatione0
Value
2–70%e0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration from 0 to 15% improved tomato yield by 12–44%.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
12–44%e0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration improved tomato fruit quality.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15%e0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
0–15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that increasing the aeration ratio in the range of 0–15% was conducive to the enhancement of tomato root vigor (the ability of triphenyltetrazolium chloride to be reduced, 3–104%) and the leaf net photosynthetic rate (14–63%), favorable to the facilitation of plant dry matter accumulation (3–59%) and plant nitrogen accumulation (2–70%), and beneficial to the improvement of tomato yield (12–44%) and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing aeration beyond 10% had no significant effect on single-fruit weight, tomato yield, or fruit quality.

Treatment
increase in the aeration ratioe0
Outcome
single-fruit weight, tomato yield, and fruit qualitye0
Direction
no significant effectse0
Qualifier
since the aeration ratio exceeded 10%e0
Comparator
10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interestingly, since the aeration ratio exceeded 10%, the increase in the aeration ratio showed no significant effects on the single-fruit weight, tomato yield, and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under aerated underground drip irrigation, reducing nitrogen topdressing by 25% improved tomato root vigor by 5–31%.

Treatment
reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25%e0
Outcome
tomato root vigore0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
5–31%e0
Comparator
80 kg·ha−1e0
Setting
aerated underground drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, with aerated underground drip irrigation, properly reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25% was favorable for enhancing tomato root vigor (5–31%), increasing tomato yield (0.5–9%), and improving fruit soluble solid accumulation (2–5%) and soluble sugar formation (4–9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under aerated underground drip irrigation, reducing nitrogen topdressing by 25% improved tomato yield by 0.5–9%.

Treatment
reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25%e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
0.5–9%e0
Comparator
80 kg·ha−1e0
Setting
aerated underground drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, with aerated underground drip irrigation, properly reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25% was favorable for enhancing tomato root vigor (5–31%), increasing tomato yield (0.5–9%), and improving fruit soluble solid accumulation (2–5%) and soluble sugar formation (4–9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under aerated underground drip irrigation, reducing nitrogen topdressing by 25% improved fruit soluble solid accumulation by 2–5%.

Treatment
reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25%e0
Outcome
fruit soluble solid accumulatione0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
2–5%e0
Comparator
80 kg·ha−1e0
Setting
aerated underground drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, with aerated underground drip irrigation, properly reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25% was favorable for enhancing tomato root vigor (5–31%), increasing tomato yield (0.5–9%), and improving fruit soluble solid accumulation (2–5%) and soluble sugar formation (4–9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under aerated underground drip irrigation, reducing nitrogen topdressing by 25% improved soluble sugar formation by 4–9%.

Treatment
reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25%e0
Outcome
soluble sugar formatione0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
4–9%e0
Comparator
80 kg·ha−1e0
Setting
aerated underground drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, with aerated underground drip irrigation, properly reducing the traditional nitrogen topdressing level (80 kg·ha−1) by 25% was favorable for enhancing tomato root vigor (5–31%), increasing tomato yield (0.5–9%), and improving fruit soluble solid accumulation (2–5%) and soluble sugar formation (4–9%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% aeration increase could compensate for a 25% nitrogen reduction by improving leaf photosynthetic rate and plant dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio by 5%e0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic rate, promoting plant dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Importantly, increasing the aeration ratio by 5% could compensate for the adverse effects of reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25% by improving the leaf photosynthetic rate, promoting plant dry matter accumulation, increasing tomato yield, and enhancing the soluble solid and soluble sugar accumulation in tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% aeration increase could compensate for a 25% nitrogen reduction by increasing tomato yield.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio by 5%e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Importantly, increasing the aeration ratio by 5% could compensate for the adverse effects of reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25% by improving the leaf photosynthetic rate, promoting plant dry matter accumulation, increasing tomato yield, and enhancing the soluble solid and soluble sugar accumulation in tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5% aeration increase could compensate for a 25% nitrogen reduction by enhancing fruit soluble solids and sugars.

Treatment
increasing the aeration ratio by 5%e0
Outcome
soluble solid and soluble sugar accumulation in tomato fruitse0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Importantly, increasing the aeration ratio by 5% could compensate for the adverse effects of reducing the nitrogen topdressing level by 25% by improving the leaf photosynthetic rate, promoting plant dry matter accumulation, increasing tomato yield, and enhancing the soluble solid and soluble sugar accumulation in tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1594 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 kg·ha−1 nitrogen topdressing and 10% aeration for tomato underground drip irrigation in Yinbei, Ningxia.

Outcome
nitrogen topdressing level of 60 kg·ha−1 and the corresponding proper aeration ratio of 10%e0
Setting
Yinbei Irrigation District of Ningxiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a favorable nitrogen topdressing level of 60 kg·ha−1 and the corresponding proper aeration ratio of 10% were suggested for tomato underground drip irrigation in the Yinbei Irrigation District of Ningxia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1964 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 26 positive, 20 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 48 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 108 positive, 45 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.