Paper · 2024 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

The responses of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit to ethylene during regular and controlled atmosphere storage

Yujie Han; Julian Heyes; Marcin Glowacz; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Maintaining kiwifruit firmness is key to global supply chain. Controlled atmosphere (CA) technology can maintain kiwifruit quality. However, there is a risk of ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) accumulation in CA that may accelerate kiwifruit softening. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of ethylene on kiwifruit quality in CA. ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit were stored in air and CA (5% CO 2 + 2% O 2 ) at 0°C, 95% RH for 13 weeks. Ethylene at concentrations of 10, 100, 1000 nL·L −1 was added after 3 weeks of storage. The responses of kiwifruit to ethylene were dose‐dependent in both air and CA storage. Ethylene‐induced kiwifruit softening was delayed and slowed by CA. However, white‐core inclusions (WCI) disorder was observed after 8 weeks of exposure to 100 and 1000 nL·L −1 ethylene in CA. The lowest concentrations of ethylene (≤ 10 nL·L −1 ) in CA did not influence kiwifruit quality. This work demonstrates that kiwifruit sensitivity to ethylene is lower in CA than that in air, but excessive softening and WCI may negatively impact kiwifruit quality when exposed to a high ethylene concentration in CA for extended periods. Hence, ethylene monitoring and management may be less critical in kiwifruit stored in CA but are required.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kiwifruit responses to ethylene were dose-dependent in both air and CA storage.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae0
Material
Haywardt0
Treatment
ethylenee0
Outcome
responses of kiwifruit to ethylenee0
Qualifier
dose‐dependent in both air and CA storagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Hayward’ kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“The responses of kiwifruit to ethylene were dose‐dependent in both air and CA storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA delayed and slowed ethylene-induced kiwifruit softening.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae1
Treatment
CAe1
Outcome
kiwifruit softeninge1
Direction
delayed and slowede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ethylene‐induced kiwifruit softening was delayed and slowed by CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White-core inclusions disorder was observed after 8 weeks of exposure to ethylene in CA.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
ethylenee2
Outcome
white‐core inclusions (WCI) disordere2
Qualifier
after 8 weeks of exposuree2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Hayward’ kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, white‐core inclusions (WCI) disorder was observed after 8 weeks of exposure to 100 and 1000 nL·L −1 ethylene in CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest ethylene concentrations (10 nL·L −1 or less) in CA did not influence kiwifruit quality.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae3
Treatment
ethylenee3
Outcome
kiwifruit qualitye3
Direction
did not influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The lowest concentrations of ethylene (≤ 10 nL·L −1) in CA did not influence kiwifruit quality”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 809–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kiwifruit sensitivity to ethylene is lower in CA than in air.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae4
Treatment
CAe4
Outcome
sensitivity to ethylenee4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
aire4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This work demonstrates that kiwifruit sensitivity to ethylene is lower in CA than that in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–999 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene monitoring and management may be less critical for kiwifruit stored in CA but are still required.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosae5
Outcome
ethylene monitoring and managemente5
Qualifier
may be less criticale5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Hence, ethylene monitoring and management may be less critical in kiwifruit stored in CA but are required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1252 · show in text ↑

ethene · quality: general · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · physiology: hormones · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.