Paper · 2024 · Weed Research

Soil characteristics and management system influence weed–crop competition

Bàrbara Baraibar; Clàudia Knudsen

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract The resource pool diversity hypothesis (RPDH) posits that organic systems that include diverse crop rotations, green manure and organic fertilizers have a greater diversity of resource pools that can alleviate weed–crop competition compared to conventional systems. To test the RPDH, wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and wild oats ( Avena sterilis ) in winter, and maize ( Zea mays ) and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in summer, were grown in pots in soils from organic (ORG) and conventional (CONV) fields, with contrasting number of estimated resource pools. A replacement series design with proportions of crop: weed of 0:1, 0.25:0.75, 0.5:0.5, 0.75:0.25 and 1:0 was used. Half of the pots received an organic‐mineral fertilizer (F) and the other half did not (NF). Aerial biomass of all plants was measured. Relative Crowding Coefficient (RCC) and the product of RCC (RCCP) for each crop and weed biomass were estimated by modelling the biomass across crop: weed proportions. RCCP larger than one was used as an indicator of overyielding. In the winter experiment, wheat always outcompeted wild oats and we did not detect overyielding across fields with different number of pools, system or fertilizer. In the summer experiment, we found overyielding in ORG NF fields. Functionally different species like maize and Palmer amaranth may have been extracting nutrients from diverse pools in organic NF fields whereas with the addition of fertilizer, Palmer amaranth outcompeted maize. Biomass of monoculture crop and weed in both experiments were positively correlated with number of estimated pools, even if none of the competition indexes were. Our results provide some support for the RPHD in species that are functionally different but also question the definition and nature of the nutrient pools, as well as emphasize the need for more research in the area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat outcompeted wild oats in the winter experiment.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
outcompeted wild oatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the winter experiment, wheat always outcompeted wild oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No overyielding was detected in winter across field resource pools, system or fertilizer.

Interactor
wild oatsAvenae1weed
Outcome
overyieldinge0
Direction
did not detecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we did not detect overyielding across fields with different number of pools, system or fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed–crop competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and wild oats ( Avena sterilis ) in winter, and maize ( Zea mays ) and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer organic fields without fertilizer showed overyielding.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
overyieldinge0
Setting
ORG NF fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the summer experiment, we found overyielding in ORG NF fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and wild oats ( Avena sterilis ) in winter, and maize ( Zea mays ) and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With fertilizer addition, Palmer amaranth outcompeted maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
addition of fertilizere0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth outcompeted maizee0
Direction
outcompetede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the addition of fertilizer, Palmer amaranth outcompeted maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monoculture crop and weed biomass in both experiments correlated positively with estimated pool number.

Outcome
Biomass of monoculture crop and weede0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
number of estimated poolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass of monoculture crop and weed in both experiments were positively correlated with number of estimated pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1613 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and wild oats ( Avena sterilis ) in winter, and maize ( Zea mays ) and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–440 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition indexes did not correlate with estimated pool number.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
competition indexese0
Setting
number of estimated poolse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the competition indexes were”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1659 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biomass of monoculture crop and weed in both experiments were positively correlated with number of estimated pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1613 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and wild oats ( Avena sterilis ) in winter, and maize ( Zea mays ) and Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–440 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.