Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Varieties and Nutrient Treatments on Physiological and Phenological Parameters of Summer Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

Akshay Pareek; . Satyajeet; Khemendra Choudhary; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during the summer season of 2020 at Regional Research Station (Bawal), CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to study the response of greengran to different varieties and nutrients treatments. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with four replications. The main plot consisted of varieties (MH-421, MH-318 and SML-668) and sub-plot consisted of nutrient treatments (Control, 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), 75% RDF + 25% FYM + Rhizobium + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB), 50% RDF + 50% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB). The findings suggest that variety MH-318 gave significantly higher no. of branches, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area duration (LAD) as well as phenological traits such as days taken to 50% flowering (days) over SML-668 and MH-421. Among the nutrient treatments, application of 75% RDF + 25% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB demonstrated superior performance across physiological (no. of branches, leaf area, LAI and LAD) and phenological traits (50% flowering) over 100% RDF, 50% RDF + 50% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB and control. Thus, a combination of variety MH-318 with 75% RDF + 25% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB helps in enhancing the physiological and phenological parameters of greengram without negative influence on plant and the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-318 had significantly higher branching, leaf traits and days to half flowering than SML-668.

Taxon
Vigna radiata L.Vigna radiatat0
Material
MH-318e0
Outcome
no. of branches, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area duration (LAD)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SML-668e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety MH-318 gave significantly higher no. of branches, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area duration (LAD) as well as phenological traits such as days taken to 50% flowering (days) over SML-668 and MH-421”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-318 had significantly higher branching, leaf traits and days to half flowering than MH-421.

Taxon
Vigna radiata L.Vigna radiatat0
Material
MH-318e0
Outcome
days taken to 50% flowering (days)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MH-421e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety MH-318 gave significantly higher no. of branches, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI) and leaf area duration (LAD) as well as phenological traits such as days taken to 50% flowering (days) over SML-668 and MH-421”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF plus 25% FYM, Rhizobium and PSB treatment outperformed the other treatments for growth and flowering traits.

Taxon
Vigna radiata L.Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% FYM + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
no. of branches, leaf area, LAI and LADe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
100% RDF, 50% RDF + 50% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF + 25% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB demonstrated superior performance across physiological (no. of branches, leaf area, LAI and LAD) and phenological traits (50% flowering) over 100% RDF, 50% RDF + 50% FYM + Rhizobium + PSB and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 66 positive, 2 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.