Paper · 2023 · RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber

Uso do extracto de tabaco como pesticida para o combate às lagartas e pulgões da couve: estudo de caso do posto administrativo de Matsinho

Gerre Zebedias Samo Sithole; Hipolito da Catarina Antonio João Dias; Jaime Ernesto Naene; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study is the result of an experimental research that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of tobacco extract as a pesticide to combat cabbage caterpillars and aphids in the Administrative Post of Matsinho. In order to understand the research data, the methodology consisted of bibliographical research and field work, with a sample made of seven cabbage beds, treated in turn in a different way. Based on direct observation, it was possible to conclude that tobacco extracts prepared at 0.1 kg/l undiluted and diluted by half are efficient in combating cabbage caterpillars and aphids causing collateral damage to cabbage, while those diluted at 25% despite the slow action, were equally efficient and more suitable to be used as a pesticide to combat aphids and cabbage caterpillars as they do not cause constraints to this crop. Given the relevance of the study, it is suggested that research be carried out on the effectiveness of tobacco extract in combating other pests of various agricultural crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco extracts prepared at 0.1 kg/l, undiluted and diluted by half, were efficient in combating cabbage caterpillars and aphids.

Treatment
tobacco extracts prepared at 0.1 kg/l undiluted and diluted by halfe1
Interactor
cabbage caterpillarse1pest
Second interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
efficient in combating cabbage caterpillars and aphidse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven cabbage beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–368 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco extracts prepared at 0.1 kg/l undiluted and diluted by half are efficient in combating cabbage caterpillars and aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco extract diluted at 25%, despite slow action, was equally efficient and more suitable as a pesticide against aphids and cabbage caterpillars because it did not cause constraints to the crop.

Treatment
diluted at 25%e1
Interactor
cabbage caterpillarse1pest
Second interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
equally efficient and more suitable to be used as a pesticidee1
Qualifier
despite the slow actione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven cabbage beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–368 · show in text ↑
e1

“those diluted at 25% despite the slow action, were equally efficient and more suitable to be used as a pesticide to combat aphids and cabbage caterpillars as they do not cause constraints to this crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–839 · show in text ↑

Nicotiana tabacum · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.