Paper · 2024 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Screening the Polyethylene Glycol 6000 Induced Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars Drought Response at The Germination Stage

Celik, Sadettin

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cotton is the most important source of natural fiber used in the textile industry and oil. Cotton provides raw materials for approximately 50 industry branches; it is a source of livelihood for about 200 million people worldwide. There are about 20 biotic and abiotic stress factors that limit the production of cotton. Drought is one of the most destructive abiotic stresses in all cotton-growing areas. Since drought is an abiotic stress factor that directly or indirectly affects the entire world negatively, a multifaceted approach is necessary to combat drought. This experiment was conducted in the University of Bingol, Genç Vocational School, Agriculture Biotechnology laboratory, in May 2023 year. The objective of the research was to explore upland cotton cultivar’s reaction to drought conditions induced by osmotic pressure stresses of 0 MPa (control), -4 MPa, -6 MPa, -8 MPa, and -10 MPa using PEG6000 chemical on Ten upland cotton cultivars. Germination percentage (GP, %) of cultivars was measured. In conclusion, In summary, May 344 and May 455 cultivars display notably superior tolerance to Osmotic Stress in contrast to other varieties, with Beren and SG-125 also showing relatively favorable tolerance levels. These discoveries offer valuable perspectives into the germination characteristics of these cultivars across diverse osmotic environments. Cultivars exhibiting consistently high germination percentages (GP) should be sown in uncontrolled field conditions to evaluate their germination and emergence potential. Moreover, cultivars demonstrating a fast germination rate and emergence may have genes associated with the earliness traits in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May 344 and May 455 cultivars showed superior tolerance to osmotic stress than other varieties

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
May 344 and May 455 cultivarse1
Treatment
Osmotic Stresse1
Outcome
tolerancee1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
other varietiese1

Verbatim

e0

“explore upland cotton cultivar’s reaction to drought conditions induced by osmotic pressure stresses of 0 MPa (control), -4 MPa, -6 MPa, -8 MPa, and -10 MPa using PEG6000 chemical on Ten upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“May 344 and May 455 cultivars display notably superior tolerance to Osmotic Stress in contrast to other varieties, with Beren and SG-125 also showing relatively favorable tolerance levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beren showed relatively favorable tolerance levels under osmotic stress

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
Berene1
Treatment
Osmotic Stresse1
Outcome
tolerance levelse1
Direction
favorablee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“explore upland cotton cultivar’s reaction to drought conditions induced by osmotic pressure stresses of 0 MPa (control), -4 MPa, -6 MPa, -8 MPa, and -10 MPa using PEG6000 chemical on Ten upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“May 344 and May 455 cultivars display notably superior tolerance to Osmotic Stress in contrast to other varieties, with Beren and SG-125 also showing relatively favorable tolerance levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SG-125 showed relatively favorable tolerance levels under osmotic stress

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
SG-125e1
Treatment
Osmotic Stresse1
Outcome
tolerance levelse1
Direction
favorablee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“explore upland cotton cultivar’s reaction to drought conditions induced by osmotic pressure stresses of 0 MPa (control), -4 MPa, -6 MPa, -8 MPa, and -10 MPa using PEG6000 chemical on Ten upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“May 344 and May 455 cultivars display notably superior tolerance to Osmotic Stress in contrast to other varieties, with Beren and SG-125 also showing relatively favorable tolerance levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1228 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars with consistently high germination percentage should be sown in uncontrolled field conditions to evaluate emergence potential

Taxon
upland cottone0
Outcome
sown in uncontrolled field conditionse2
Setting
uncontrolled field conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“explore upland cotton cultivar’s reaction to drought conditions induced by osmotic pressure stresses of 0 MPa (control), -4 MPa, -6 MPa, -8 MPa, and -10 MPa using PEG6000 chemical on Ten upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–954 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cultivars exhibiting consistently high germination percentages (GP) should be sown in uncontrolled field conditions to evaluate their germination and emergence potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1538 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.