Paper · 2024 · Journal of Applied and Natural Science

Yield assessment of rice-black gram, rice-maize and rice-groundnut sequential cropping system influenced by rice establishment methods and nutrient management practices in the dry tract of the Southern zone of Tamil Nadu, India

S. Swathi; C. Ravikumar; M. Thiruppathi; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Integrated nutrient management (INM) practices and suitable cropping systems are an effective and promising way for enhancing crop productivity. However, the impact of proper INM practices and cultivation methods in rice cropping systems in dry tracts remains unclear. The field study evaluated the suitable cropping system under different rice establishment methods with INM practices in a sequential cropping system( rice-black gram, rice-maize, and rice-groundnut). Treatments were designed as two rice establishment methods [Direct Seeded Rice (DSR) and Transplanted Rice (TPR)] and five INM practices [RDF-Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (120:40:40 kg NPK ha-1) alone, RDF + Poultry manure compost @ 5 t ha-1, RDF+ Coir pith compost @ 5 t ha-1, RDF+ Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1 and RDF-Green leaf manure @ 6.25 t ha-1]. TPR with the INM practice of RDF + poultry manure compost @ 5 t ha-1 recorded maximum productive tillers m-2 (351), number of filled grains panicle-1 (130.2), grain yield (6709 kg ha-1) and straw yield (9015 kg ha-1) of rice. Rice fallow crops (black gram, maize and groundnut) recorded 10 – 24,10-18 and 10 - 21 % higher values of yield components and yield, respectively, in DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1 . Thus, RDF plus green manure or poultry manure application is an apt INM practice for a rice-based sequential cropping system under DSR, and the rice-black gram is an economical and sustainable cropping system for dry tracts of the southern zone of Tamil Nadu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted rice with poultry manure compost gave 351 productive tillers per square metre.

Treatment
TPR with the INM practice of RDF + poultry manure compost @ 5 t ha-1e0
Outcome
productive tillers m-2e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
351e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TPR with the INM practice of RDF + poultry manure compost @ 5 t ha-1 recorded maximum productive tillers m-2 (351)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave 130.2 filled grains per panicle.

Outcome
number of filled grains panicle-1e0
Value
130.2e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of filled grains panicle-1 (130.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave rice grain yield of 6709 kg ha-1.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
6709 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield (6709 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave straw yield of 9015 kg ha-1.

Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
9015 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (9015 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram after DSR with RDF and green manure had 10–24% higher yield components and yield.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield components and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10 – 24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black gram, maize and groundnut) recorded 10 – 24,10-18 and 10 - 21 % higher values of yield components and yield, respectively, in DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize after DSR with RDF and green manure had 10–18% higher yield components and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield components and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10-18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black gram, maize and groundnut) recorded 10 – 24,10-18 and 10 - 21 % higher values of yield components and yield, respectively, in DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut after DSR with RDF and green manure had 10–21% higher yield components and yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield components and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10 - 21 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“black gram, maize and groundnut) recorded 10 – 24,10-18 and 10 - 21 % higher values of yield components and yield, respectively, in DSR with INM treatment of RDF + Green manure @ 6.25 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1258 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend RDF plus green or poultry manure in direct-seeded sequential rice systems.

Outcome
RDF plus green manure or poultry manure applicatione0
Qualifier
under DSRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF plus green manure or poultry manure application is an apt INM practice for a rice-based sequential cropping system under DSR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1395 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor rice–black gram as an economical and sustainable system for the region.

Outcome
rice-black grame0
Setting
southern zone of Tamil Nadue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice-black gram is an economical and sustainable cropping system for dry tracts of the southern zone of Tamil Nadu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1519 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

transplanting · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.