Abstract
In this study, the effects of different doses and applications of vermicompost formed by composting cow manure with Red California Worm Eisenia fetida (Lumbricidae) on the growth, development, and pesticide resistance of L. sativa var. crispa (Lettuce) was tried to be determined. Vermicompost was applied in solid and liquid form at rates 10%, 20% and 30%. The leaf length, leaf width, chlorophyll amount (SPAD), number of marketable leaves, number of discarded leaves, leaf pH, leaf nitrogen content and pesticide residue analyze were examined in plant samples. In addition, texture, pH, organic matter, EC, total N, P, K, Mg and Ca analyzes were made in the soil samples and vermicompost used in the study. According to the statistical analysis results of the study, it was determined that all results except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzes were statistically significant in terms of vermicompost type and dose. In all the parameters studied, solid vermicompost application have higher results than both the control and commercial liquid vermicompost. The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose. The number of marketable leaves was the same in all doses of solid vermicompost application. However, it was no found statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyzes in terms of vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactions. The fungicide residue levels were above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samples.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Solid vermicompost gave higher results than the control and commercial liquid vermicompost in all parameters studied.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Treatment
- solid vermicompost applicatione1
- Outcome
- parameters studiede1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- the control and commercial liquid vermicomposte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e1“In all the parameters studied, solid vermicompost application have higher results than both the control and commercial liquid vermicompost”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost type and dose gave statistically significant differences in all lettuce results except leaf pH, discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyses.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Treatment
- vermicompost type and dosee2
- Outcome
- all resultse2
- Qualifier
- except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e2“all results except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzes were statistically significant in terms of vermicompost type and dose”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf length and leaf width were highest at the 20% dose of solid vermicompost.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Organ / stage
- leafe3
- Treatment
- 20% dose of solid vermicomposte3
- Outcome
- leaf length and width valuese3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e3“The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen were highest at the 30% dose of vermicompost.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Treatment
- 30% dosee3
- Outcome
- chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen valuese3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e3“The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of marketable leaves was the same at all doses of solid vermicompost.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Treatment
- all doses of solid vermicompost applicatione5
- Outcome
- number of marketable leavese5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e5“The number of marketable leaves was the same in all doses of solid vermicompost application”
Claim · model-written summary
No statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyses was found among vermicompost types, doses or their interactions.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Treatment
- vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactionse6
- Outcome
- pesticide residue analyzese6
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e6“it was no found statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyzes in terms of vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactions”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide residue levels were above the maximum residue limits in all studied lettuce samples.
- Taxon
- Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispat0 - Outcome
- fungicide residue levelse7
- Qualifier
- above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samplese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”
e7“The fungicide residue levels were above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samples”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
244 papers more in this group
See all 248 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.