Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Liquid organic fertilizer effectiveness test and the combination with chemical fertilizer on maize to increase yield in dry land

A Krismawati; Z Arifin; T Purbiati; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the research was to examine the effectiveness of Liquid Organic Fertilizer (LOF) combination with chemical fertilizer on maize to increase yield in dry land. The research was conducted from May to October 2018 in Kediri Regency. The research used a RBD with seven treatments and four replications, namely were: A = Control; B = RRCF; C = 6 L LOF ha -1 ; D = ¾ RRCF + 3 L LOF ha -1 ; E = ¾ RRCF + 6 L LOF ha -1 ; F = RRCF + 3 L LOF ha -1 , and G = RRCF + 6 L LOF ha -1 . The data were analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS 2.2 software, and result further tested using DMRT at 5% significance level. The addition 6 L LOF ha -1 with RRCF (G), seeds yield of maize reached 8.44 t.ha -1 it yield was higher than the treatment of 3 L LOF ha -1 with RRCF (F) which was 7.85 t.ha -1 . The calculation of the RAE value showed that treatment G obtained the highest RAE value of 139.46%, while the second highest RAE value was obtained for treatment F of 119.73%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RRCF plus 6 L LOF ha -1 yielded 8.44 t.ha -1, higher than RRCF plus 3 L LOF ha -1 at 7.85 t.ha -1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
6 L LOF ha -1 with RRCFe0
Outcome
seeds yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.44 t.ha -1e0
Qualifier
7.85 t.ha -1e0
Comparator
3 L LOF ha -1 with RRCFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition 6 L LOF ha -1 with RRCF (G), seeds yield of maize reached 8.44 t.ha -1 it yield was higher than the treatment of 3 L LOF ha -1 with RRCF (F) which was 7.85 t.ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–786 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment G had the highest RAE value at 139.46%.

Treatment
treatment Ge0
Outcome
RAE valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
139.46%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“treatment G obtained the highest RAE value of 139.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment F had the second highest RAE value at 119.73%.

Treatment
treatment Fe0
Outcome
RAE valuee0
Direction
second higheste0
Value
119.73%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the second highest RAE value was obtained for treatment F of 119.73%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–963 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.