Paper · 2024 · LWT

Enhancing mango anthracnose control and quality maintenance through chitosan and iturin A coating

Zhemin Li; Xiufang Bi; Yushan Dai; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
25
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The effectiveness of iturin A (IA) and chitosan (CTS) coating, alone or in combination (CTS-IA), against mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was investigated. In vitro tests, concentrations of IA ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 g/L, and CTS ranging from 10 g/L to 20 g/L, significantly inhibited the growth of C. gloeosporioides. Moreover, the combination of IA with 15 g/L CTS demonstrated an additional inhibitory effect on C. gloeosporioides growth. In vivo experiments, 0.12 g/L IA with 15 g/L CTS had a synergistic effect in preventing lesion expansion in mangoes after 20 days of storage at 12 °C. Compared to using IA or CTS alone, CTS-IA coating showed better results in disease control, respiratory rate, weight loss, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and fruit firmness maintenance during storage. The combined effect of IA and CTS may be mainly attributed to the enhancement of mango defense enzymes such as GR, CAT, APX, and POD induced by the CTS-IA. In conclusion, CTS-IA may have significant potential in postharvest preservation applications for mangoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iturin A at 0.03–0.12 g/L significantly inhibited C. gloeosporioides growth in vitro.

Taxon
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0
Treatment
IA ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 g/Le0
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioidese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · TaxonRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of IA ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 g/L, and CTS ranging from 10 g/L to 20 g/L, significantly inhibited the growth of C. gloeosporioides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–346 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 10–20 g/L significantly inhibited C. gloeosporioides growth in vitro.

Taxon
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0
Treatment
CTS ranging from 10 g/L to 20 g/Le0
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioidese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · TaxonRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of IA ranging from 0.03 to 0.12 g/L, and CTS ranging from 10 g/L to 20 g/L, significantly inhibited the growth of C. gloeosporioides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IA combined with 15 g/L CTS added inhibition of C. gloeosporioides growth.

Taxon
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0
Treatment
combination of IA with 15 g/L CTSe0
Outcome
C. gloeosporioides growthe0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · TaxonRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of IA with 15 g/L CTS demonstrated an additional inhibitory effect on C. gloeosporioides growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.12 g/L IA and 15 g/L CTS synergistically prevented lesion expansion in stored mangoes.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
0.12 g/L IA with 15 g/L CTSe0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
lesion expansione0
Direction
preventinge0
Qualifier
after 20 days of storage at 12 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.12 g/L IA with 15 g/L CTS had a synergistic effect in preventing lesion expansion in mangoes after 20 days of storage at 12 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined CTS-IA coating provided better disease control than either coating alone.

Treatment
CTS-IA coatinge0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
IA or CTS alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to using IA or CTS alone, CTS-IA coating showed better results in disease control, respiratory rate, weight loss, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and fruit firmness maintenance during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined CTS-IA coating performed better for respiratory rate and weight loss during storage than either coating alone.

Treatment
CTS-IA coatinge0
Outcome
respiratory rate, weight losse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
during storagee0
Comparator
IA or CTS alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to using IA or CTS alone, CTS-IA coating showed better results in disease control, respiratory rate, weight loss, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and fruit firmness maintenance during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined CTS-IA coating better maintained total soluble solids, titratable acidity and fruit firmness than either coating alone.

Treatment
CTS-IA coatinge0
Outcome
total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and fruit firmness maintenancee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
during storagee0
Comparator
IA or CTS alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to using IA or CTS alone, CTS-IA coating showed better results in disease control, respiratory rate, weight loss, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and fruit firmness maintenance during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed that CTS-IA enhances mango defense enzymes GR, CAT, APX and POD.

Treatment
CTS-IAe0
Gene
GR, CAT, APX, and PODe0
Outcome
enhancement of mango defense enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effect of IA and CTS may be mainly attributed to the enhancement of mango defense enzymes such as GR, CAT, APX, and POD induced by the CTS-IA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–988 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest CTS-IA for postharvest preservation of mangoes.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Treatment
CTS-IAe0
Outcome
postharvest preservation applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTS-IA may have significant potential in postharvest preservation applications for mangoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1095 · show in text ↑

chitosan · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

storage · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.