Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Water Management

Water productivity and yield characteristics of transplanted rice in puddled soil under drip tape irrigation

Ramtin Nabipour; Mohammad Reza Yazdani; Farhad Mirzaei; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Lowland rice flooding, while consuming considerable water, has adverse environmental effects, including releasing methane into the atmosphere, aggravating climate change. Several drawbacks can be attributed to water-saving alternatives, such as aerobic rice, whereas rice drip irrigation techniques have been evaluated primarily under aerobic conditions. This study investigated drip tape irrigation technique with different lateral spacings for transplanted rice in puddled paddy soil at the Rice Research Institute of Iran in Rasht over two years (2020 and 2021), compared to intermittent irrigation. In twelve isolated concrete basins, three treatments with lateral spacings of 40 (T40), 60 (T60), and 80 cm (T80), were compared with a fixed five-day period intermittent irrigation (INT). In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio. In contrast, T80 resulted in the lowest grain weight (2892 and 3653 kg ha−1, respectively) and yield characteristics values, while producing the highest weeds population. Drip tape irrigation significantly reduced water application by 27% and 36% in 2020 and 2021, respectively and T40 achieved the highest water productivity, at 0.68 kg m−3. The economic water productivity estimation of drip tape irrigation can range from 0.11 to 0.51 US$ m−3 in various scenarios, while that of intermittent irrigation remains at 0.25 US$ m−3.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INT produced high grain yield of 3814.

Treatment
INTe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3814e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INT produced high grain yield of 4758 kg ha−1.

Treatment
INTe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4758 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T40 produced high grain yield of 3613.

Treatment
T40e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3613e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T40 produced high grain yield of 4020 kg ha−1.

Treatment
T40e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4020 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T40 had the highest sterile spikelets ratio.

Treatment
T40e0
Outcome
sterile spikelets ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2020 and 2021, the INT treatment produced the highest grain yield (3814 and 4758 kg ha−1, respectively) and among drip tape treatments, T40 demonstrated the highest grain yield (3613 and 4020 kg ha−1, respectively), comparable with INT’s yield but with the highest sterile spikelets ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T80 had the lowest grain weight, 2892.

Treatment
T80e0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2892e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, T80 resulted in the lowest grain weight (2892 and 3653 kg ha−1, respectively) and yield characteristics values, while producing the highest weeds population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T80 had the lowest grain weight, 3653 kg ha−1.

Treatment
T80e0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3653 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, T80 resulted in the lowest grain weight (2892 and 3653 kg ha−1, respectively) and yield characteristics values, while producing the highest weeds population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T80 had the lowest yield characteristics values.

Treatment
T80e0
Outcome
yield characteristics valuese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, T80 resulted in the lowest grain weight (2892 and 3653 kg ha−1, respectively) and yield characteristics values, while producing the highest weeds population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T80 produced the highest weed population.

Treatment
T80e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds populatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, T80 resulted in the lowest grain weight (2892 and 3653 kg ha−1, respectively) and yield characteristics values, while producing the highest weeds population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip tape irrigation reduced water application by 27%.

Treatment
Drip tape irrigatione0
Outcome
water applicatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip tape irrigation significantly reduced water application by 27% and 36% in 2020 and 2021, respectively and T40 achieved the highest water productivity, at 0.68 kg m−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip tape irrigation reduced water application by 36%.

Treatment
Drip tape irrigatione0
Outcome
water applicatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip tape irrigation significantly reduced water application by 27% and 36% in 2020 and 2021, respectively and T40 achieved the highest water productivity, at 0.68 kg m−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T40 achieved the highest water productivity, 0.68 kg m−3.

Treatment
T40e0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.68 kg m−3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip tape irrigation significantly reduced water application by 27% and 36% in 2020 and 2021, respectively and T40 achieved the highest water productivity, at 0.68 kg m−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated drip tape economic water productivity ranges from 0.11 to 0.51 US$ m−3.

Treatment
drip tape irrigatione0
Outcome
economic water productivity estimatione0
Value
0.11 to 0.51 US$ m−3e0
Qualifier
various scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic water productivity estimation of drip tape irrigation can range from 0.11 to 0.51 US$ m−3 in various scenarios, while that of intermittent irrigation remains at 0.25 US$ m−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated intermittent irrigation economic water productivity is 0.25 US$ m−3.

Treatment
intermittent irrigatione0
Outcome
economic water productivitye0
Value
0.25 US$ m−3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic water productivity estimation of drip tape irrigation can range from 0.11 to 0.51 US$ m−3 in various scenarios, while that of intermittent irrigation remains at 0.25 US$ m−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.