Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Alleviating the drought stress and improving the plant resistance properties of Triticum aestivum via biopriming with aspergillus fumigatus

Nelly Michel George; Gehad Hany-Ali; Ekram Abdelhaliem; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most widely grown and vital cereal crops, containing a high percentage of basic nutrients such as carbohydrates and proteins. Drought stress is one of the most significant limitations on wheat productivity. Due to climate change influences plant development and growth, physiological processes, grain quality, and yield. Drought stress has elicited a wide range of plant responses, namely physiological and molecular adaptations. Biopriming is one of the recent attempts to combat drought stress. Mitigating the harmful impact of abiotic stresses on crops by deploying extreme-habitat-adapted symbiotic microbes. The purpose of this study was to see how biopriming Triticum aestivum grains affected the effects of inoculating endophytic fungi Aspergillus fumigatus ON307213 isolated from stressed wheat plants in four model agricultural plants (Gemmiza-7, Sids-1, Sakha8, and Giza 168). And its viability in reducing drought stress through the use of phenotypic parameters such as root and shoot fresh and dry weight, shoot and root length, and so on. On a biochemical and physiological level, enzymatic parameters such as catalase and superoxidase dismutase are used. Total phenolics, flavonoids, and photosynthetic pigments are non-enzymatic parameters. Making use of molecular techniques such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: It has been found that using Aspergillus fumigatus as a biological biopriming tool can positively impact wheat plants experiencing drought stress. The total biomass of stressed wheat plants that had been bio-primed rose by more than 40% as compared to wheat plants that had not been bio-primed. A. fumigatus biopriming either increased or decreased the amount of enzymatic and non-enzymatic substances on biochemical scales, aside from the noticeable increase in photosynthetic pigment that occurs in plants that have been bio-primed and stressed. Drought-resistant genes show a biopriming influence in gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first paper to describe the practicality of a. fumigatus biopriming and its effect on minimizing the degrading effects of drought through water limitation. It suggests the potential applications of arid habitat-adapted endophytes in agricultural systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming increased total biomass of drought-stressed wheat by more than 40% compared with unprimed plants.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Aspergillus fumigatuse1
Interactor
Aspergillus fumigatusAspergillus fumigatuse1symbiont
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
rosee0
Value
more than 40%e0
Comparator
wheat plants that had not been bio-primede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMichael R Francisco from france · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total biomass of stressed wheat plants that had been bio-primed rose by more than 40% as compared to wheat plants that had not been bio-primed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1715 · show in text ↑
e1

“using Aspergillus fumigatus as a biological biopriming tool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal biopriming altered enzymatic and non-enzymatic substance amounts in both directions.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
A. fumigatus biopriminge0
Interactor
A. fumigatusAspergillus fumigatuse0symbiont
Outcome
amount of enzymatic and non-enzymatic substancese0
Direction
increased or decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMichael R Francisco from france · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. fumigatus biopriming either increased or decreased the amount of enzymatic and non-enzymatic substances on biochemical scales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1844 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants experiencing drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioprimed, stressed plants had increased photosynthetic pigment.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
A. fumigatus biopriminge2
Interactor
A. fumigatusAspergillus fumigatuse2symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMichael R Francisco from france · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“noticeable increase in photosynthetic pigment that occurs in plants that have been bio-primed and stressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–1967 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants experiencing drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“A. fumigatus biopriming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopriming influenced drought-resistance gene expression.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
A. fumigatus biopriminge2
Interactor
A. fumigatusAspergillus fumigatuse2symbiont
Gene
Drought-resistant genese0
Outcome
gene expressione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus fumigatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMichael R Francisco from france · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-resistant genes show a biopriming influence in gene expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2040 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants experiencing drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1566 · show in text ↑
e2

“A. fumigatus biopriming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1739 · show in text ↑

Aspergillus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

solarization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.